I have total of 5 assignments I need complete. Please see attachements for each assignment that is due
Watch a news report from a major news network. Then, find another report on the same topic from an online source.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
I have total of 5 assignments I need complete. Please see attachements
Just from $13/Page
Write a 750- to 1,050-word paper assessing both news stories for their clarity, relevance, depth, breadth, and significance.
Analyze the reports by answering the following questions for each:
· Who is the intended audience?
· Was the reasoning in the news report solid?
· Was the report credible?
· Was there any bias in the report?
· What, if anything, was presented as fact, that should be presented as debatable?
· Were the questions and answers relevant?
· Was there any sociocentric thinking in either report?
· What were the main differences in the two reports?
· What outside pressures could account for the different manner in which the stories were written?
Submit your assignment.
Week Four: Role Identification
0. Identify the roles of each member of the firm.
Using the skill matrix created in Week Two and the description of your consulting firm created in Week Three, determine the roles of the firm’s members.
Discuss why each member’s skills are suited for the prescribed roles.
Discuss how the established roles will interact to win consulting contracts.
Establish responsibilities of each member of the firm.
Conduct an in-depth discussion to determine the duties and responsibilities associated with each role identified by the group.
Divide the responsibilities and duties based on the team member’s skills.
Write a 350- to 700-word paper that includes the following:
The name of your consulting firm
A list and description of the identified roles of each member of the consulting firm
A list of the duties and responsibilities assigned to each member
A statement explaining why each member is best suited to his or her established role and his or her duties and responsibilities: This must include a description of how each member’s education—especially his or her program of study—and experience prepared him or her for the roles and duties. Make reference to specific courses that assisted in the preparation.
CaseStudy Assignment
GEN/
4
8
0
Version
5
|
1
|
University of Phoenix Material
Critical Thinking Case Study
Assignment Overview
Prepare a report for the CEO of AcuScan about the situation described in the GEN 480 Critical Thinking Case Study. Your report should include the following two parts:
1. Part 1: Respond to the specific questions on the worksheet that follows.
2
. Part 2: Write an executive summary for the CEO of AcuScan.
PART 1:
Use the case materials to complete this assignment.
Analysis
3
. Describe all assumptions seen in any of documents provided in the case study. Differentiate between inferences and assumptions.
For full credit, provide AT MINIMUM four to six assumptions held by Kelly; six to nine assumptions held by Pat; two to three assumptions held by Cliff; two to three assumptions held by Chris.
a. Kelly
b. Pat
c. Cliff
d. Chris
4. Explain the arguments made by each of these people.
Explanations should comprise two to six sentences for each of the following:
a. Cliff O’Connor
b. Pat Lambert
c. Kelly Thomas
d. Chris Martinas
5. Evaluate each argument listed above as sound or unsound and why. Indicate whether they are emotional or logical in nature.
Evaluations should comprise two to six sentences for each of the following:
a. Cliff O’Connor
b. Pat Lambert
c. Kelly Thomas
d. Chris Martinas
6. Describe specific fallacious arguments, and identify the people who hold them.
For full credit, provide AT MINIMUM four to six fallacious arguments.
Conclusions
7. Describe all problems in this situation.
Describe a minimum of two to three problems that characterize the situation. Single-sentence format is acceptable.
8. For each problem listed above, describe the data, arguments, and reasoning that contribute to the problem.
Describe in two to six sentences the issues of data, arguments, and reasoning related to each problem.
9. What is the underlying problem that is the base cause of the conflict within AcuScan? Present the underlying problem in one to four sentences.
10. What alternative solutions would you propose for this situation? Present a MIMINUM of two potential solutions in the format of two to four sentences each.
11. State the relative strengths and weaknesses of each alternative solution. Describe at least one strength and one weakness for each alternative solution.
12. Which solution will you recommend to the CEO and why? In two to six sentences, fully articulate the exact solution you would propose and the reason(s) for that choice.
PART 2:
Executive Summary
Write an executive summary of the case for the CEO of AcuScan. The executive summary should give readers the essential contents of the master document(s) in approximately two pages. It should preview the main points of your document, enabling readers to build a mental framework for organizing and understanding the detailed information you are presenting, and helping them determine the key results and recommendations reported in your document. Be sure to include the following:
13. Purpose and scope of document
14. Summary of the situation
15. Key points relating to the situation
16. Conclusions
17. Recommendations and actions to be taken, and why
18. Other supportive information:
a. The executive summary should be 700 to 1,050 words in length.
b. The following rubric will be used to grade the executive summary:
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
0
|
|
Content/Development 40%
|
|
19. The context and purpose of the writing is clear.
|
|
20. The situation is concisely summarized.
|
|
21. Major points and key details are stated.
|
|
22. Reasoning is logical and supported by specific details/examples.
|
|
23. Analysis and conclusions are supported by accurate and complete information.
|
|
24. Clear recommendations are presented for solving the problem(s).
|
|
25. Justification for specific recommendations to solve the problem(s) is presented.
|
|
Organization/Format 20%
|
|
26. Structure is well organized and readable.
|
|
27. Ideas flow in logical sequence.
|
|
28. Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.
|
|
29. Conclusion is logical and clearly stated.
|
|
30. Paper meets minimum word-count requirements.
|
|
Grammar 20%
|
|
31. No grammar errors are present.
|
|
32. No punctuation errors are present.
|
|
33. No spelling errors are present.
|
|
34. No syntax or semantics errors are present.
|
|
35. Sentences are complete; no run-ons or fragments.
|
|
Style 20%
|
|
36. Sentences are fluent and well built.
|
|
37. Word choice accurately reflects content.
|
|
38. Concepts are cohesive; paper stands together as a whole.
|
Week Five: Consultant Scenario Paper and Presentation
0. Finalize a 2,800 to 3,500-word paper that includes the following:
A summary of the type of consulting firm and the services you will offer
A description of the roles of each team member
A detailed analysis of how the content or concepts from at least five undergraduate core courses facilitated the analysis, development, and preparation of your weekly assignments and your final presentation: Identify the courses and the specific content or concepts from each course.
A reference list with at least 10 resources used in the analysis and development of your weekly assignments and your final presentation
CaseStudy Assignment
GEN/
4
8
0
Version
5
|
1
|
University of Phoenix Material
Critical Thinking Case Study
Assignment Overview
Prepare a report for the CEO of AcuScan about the situation described in the GEN 480 Critical Thinking Case Study. Your report should include the following two parts:
1. Part 1: Respond to the specific questions on the worksheet that follows.
2
. Part 2: Write an executive summary for the CEO of AcuScan.
PART 1:
Use the case materials to complete this assignment.
Analysis
3
. Describe all assumptions seen in any of documents provided in the case study. Differentiate between inferences and assumptions.
For full credit, provide AT MINIMUM four to six assumptions held by Kelly; six to nine assumptions held by Pat; two to three assumptions held by Cliff; two to three assumptions held by Chris.
a. Kelly
b. Pat
c. Cliff
d. Chris
4. Explain the arguments made by each of these people.
Explanations should comprise two to six sentences for each of the following:
a. Cliff O’Connor
b. Pat Lambert
c. Kelly Thomas
d. Chris Martinas
5. Evaluate each argument listed above as sound or unsound and why. Indicate whether they are emotional or logical in nature.
Evaluations should comprise two to six sentences for each of the following:
a. Cliff O’Connor
b. Pat Lambert
c. Kelly Thomas
d. Chris Martinas
6. Describe specific fallacious arguments, and identify the people who hold them.
For full credit, provide AT MINIMUM four to six fallacious arguments.
Conclusions
7. Describe all problems in this situation.
Describe a minimum of two to three problems that characterize the situation. Single-sentence format is acceptable.
8. For each problem listed above, describe the data, arguments, and reasoning that contribute to the problem.
Describe in two to six sentences the issues of data, arguments, and reasoning related to each problem.
9. What is the underlying problem that is the base cause of the conflict within AcuScan? Present the underlying problem in one to four sentences.
10. What alternative solutions would you propose for this situation? Present a MIMINUM of two potential solutions in the format of two to four sentences each.
11. State the relative strengths and weaknesses of each alternative solution. Describe at least one strength and one weakness for each alternative solution.
12. Which solution will you recommend to the CEO and why? In two to six sentences, fully articulate the exact solution you would propose and the reason(s) for that choice.
PART 2:
Executive Summary
Write an executive summary of the case for the CEO of AcuScan. The executive summary should give readers the essential contents of the master document(s) in approximately two pages. It should preview the main points of your document, enabling readers to build a mental framework for organizing and understanding the detailed information you are presenting, and helping them determine the key results and recommendations reported in your document. Be sure to include the following:
13. Purpose and scope of document
14. Summary of the situation
15. Key points relating to the situation
16. Conclusions
17. Recommendations and actions to be taken, and why
18. Other supportive information:
a. The executive summary should be 700 to 1,050 words in length.
b. The following rubric will be used to grade the executive summary:
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
0
|
|
Content/Development 40%
|
|
19. The context and purpose of the writing is clear.
|
|
20. The situation is concisely summarized.
|
|
21. Major points and key details are stated.
|
|
22. Reasoning is logical and supported by specific details/examples.
|
|
23. Analysis and conclusions are supported by accurate and complete information.
|
|
24. Clear recommendations are presented for solving the problem(s).
|
|
25. Justification for specific recommendations to solve the problem(s) is presented.
|
|
Organization/Format 20%
|
|
26. Structure is well organized and readable.
|
|
27. Ideas flow in logical sequence.
|
|
28. Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.
|
|
29. Conclusion is logical and clearly stated.
|
|
30. Paper meets minimum word-count requirements.
|
|
Grammar 20%
|
|
31. No grammar errors are present.
|
|
32. No punctuation errors are present.
|
|
33. No spelling errors are present.
|
|
34. No syntax or semantics errors are present.
|
|
35. Sentences are complete; no run-ons or fragments.
|
|
Style 20%
|
|
36. Sentences are fluent and well built.
|
|
37. Word choice accurately reflects content.
|
|
38. Concepts are cohesive; paper stands together as a whole.
|
Consulting Scenario Paper and Presentation
GEN/480 Version 3
University of Phoenix Material
Consulting Scenario Paper and Presentation
Week Three: Analysis of Business Specialties
Identify the type of consulting firm your Learning Team will create.
Based on your skill matrix, discuss the pros and cons of the types of consulting firms you identified in Week Two.
Discuss the types of problems or issues your company will address in its consulting capacity. This might include a specialty.
Discuss the types of services your firm will offer.
Analyze the need for these firms. This may require some research.
Select the consulting firm you will create. This may be from your Week Two list, or it may be a new idea based on your review of your skill matrix or needs assessment.
Write a 350- to 700-word paper that includes the following:
The name of your firm
A description of the firm you will create
A description of the types of problems and issues your firm will address
A description of the services your firm will offer
A statement explaining why this firm is well suited to the team members’ skills
