I’m a Student-Athlete from Dortmund Germany and struggle with this particular English class.
My teacher is very strict and challenging therefore I need someone who can write this paper for me to get a great result.
This Review is a pre-work of my final research paper both instructions are attached and the grading rubric is attached as well.
ENGL 205 Literature Review ASSIGNMENT: 100PTS
due 11:59pm on Monday, March 19th
(file must be in DOC, DOCX, or RTF format)
In preparation for your Research Paper, you will construct a Literature Review. The purpose of a Literature Review
is to assess what experts have already said about your topic, to get a sense of the conversation already taking place
around your area of inquiry. Your Literature Review will consist of a brief proposal followed by annotated
citations.
Use the research databases provided by the library. Consult the research librarians.
PROPOSAL:
A well-developed paragraph that names the texts being studied, the reason you are pairing the two texts (What are
the similarities between the texts that make them a good candidate for comparison?), a significant difference
between the texts, and your preliminary thoughts about what that difference might mean.
SOURCES:
Your annotated bibliography will include a total of 9 scholarly secondary sources analyzing the works you have
chosen or providing background for your project.
You should have 3 sources for Text A, 3 sources for Text B, 3 sources providing background/analysis of the
idea or topic the comparison is examining. For example, if I were writing a paper about Jacob and Arujuna, I would
have 3 sources about Genesis, 3 sources about the Bhagavad-gita, and 3 sources about the anthropological study of
ritual.
These sources will include at least 4 peer-reviewed journal articles over 9 pages long and at least 2 books or
eBooks1 (book chapters will count as PRJs). You may only use ONE article from The Explicator.
Please note that you will ultimately need to cite at least 7 secondary sources, plus your primary sources (the
literary works themselves) in your final research paper. You are NOT required to use any of the sources included in
the Literature Review in your final paper. Sometimes research ideas change during the writing process.
COMMENTARY:
After each MLA works cited entry, you will include a solid paragraph-long summary of the source and comments.
The summary portion should identify the topic, main point, and general argument of the source. The commentary
should indicate your thoughts about how the source will contribute to your project.
FORMAT:
• Page 1: After the heading (your name, etc), the Proposal.
• Each page after that should begin with an MLA Works Cited page citation for a source. After the citation,
include a solid paragraph-long summary of the source. Do not go onto a second page with your commentary.
• Sources should be in alphabetical order by last name of the author. (Just like in a Works Cited page.)
• Your final document should be 10 pages long: 1 page proposal and 9 citations/commentaries.
• The assignment will follow all other General Paper Guidelines (12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch
margins, running header, double-spacing, etc.) Please see the posted example.
1 The literary texts themselves do NOT count towards this requirement (they are primary, not secondary sources).
Superior Strong Adequate Inadequate Failure
Source Selection
20%
Lit review meets or
exceeds source
requirements,
demonstrates a
breadth of research
on the topic, and
avoids repetition. ,
Lit review meets
most requirements
but is limited in
some way.
Lit review meets
basic requirements
but may be
repetitive at times
or include gaps.
Lit review does not
meet minimum
requirements.
Lit review fails to
demonstrate
understanding of
the assignment or
ability to fulfill the
requirements.
Citations
20%
Lit review includes
a complete and
accurate MLA
citation for each
source.
Some citations
include minor
errors or
omissions.
Some citations
include significant
errors or omissions.
Many citations
contain significant
errors or omissions.
Majority of
citations contain
significant errors or
omissions.
Annotations
45%
Summaries are
accurate and
specific;
commentaries are
informative;
annotations are
well-written and of
appropriate length.
One component of
the annotation is
missing or
limited/weak in
some citations.
One component is
missing or
limited/weak in
several citations.
Lit review includes
little or no accurate
or useful
information on
sources.
Significant aspects
of the assignment
are not met.
Proposal
15%
Proposal provides a
meaningful
connection between
two appropriate
texts. Proposal
either announces a
clear, specific, and
interesting idea
and/or asks
pertinent, intriguing
questions.
Proposal identifies
a good connection
between two
appropriate texts.
Proposal identifies
a meaningful idea
about the two texts.
Proposal names two
appropriate texts
and shows a
connection between
them. Proposal
offers an idea about
the texts that is
clear.
Proposal addresses
two texts but may
be missing a
meaningful reason
to compare them.
Proposed idea is
obvious or unclear.
Proposal fails to
meet the
requirements of the
assignment.
LastName 1
FirstName LastName
Professor T. Truffin
ENGL-205
March 18th, 20xx
Moral Growth: Various Forms of a Surge of Internal Understanding
For my final paper in World Literature 1, I would like to explore the various forms that individuals have used to better themselves morally. Suspendisse orci enim, iaculis tempus sagittis eget, maximus et nisl. Integer a sollicitudin enim. Duis pharetra vestibulum nisl, nec convallis metus hendrerit eu. Nullam aliquet risus tellus, ac sagittis turpis pharetra sed. Nullam sit amet odio quis ipsum malesuada iaculis a a lorem. Cras ullamcorper velit eu ex faucibus venenatis. Nunc semper pulvinar odio, sed ullamcorper augue vestibulum non. I would like to compare and contrast the written stories describing how St. Augustine of Hippo and Arjuna explore and analyze themselves morally Sed tristique rhoncus erat, sit amet vulputate quam mattis eu. Curabitur sed ornare metus, nec faucibus nunc. Vivamus scelerisque et quam non blandit. Vivamus nec condimentum metus, but both Confessions and the Bhagavad-Gita provide stories of growth and change that will make this analysis much easier. Sed tristique rhoncus erat, sit amet vulputate quam mattis eu. Curabitur sed ornare metus, nec faucibus nunc. Vivamus scelerisque et quam non blandit. Vivamus nec condimentum metus.
Bhawuk, Dharm P.S. Spirituality and Indian Psychology. Springer New York, 2014.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent efficitur tincidunt ex id ultrices. Nam eget dui dolor. Vivamus blandit augue ac odio euismod pellentesque. Fusce at dignissim mi. Proin iaculis augue eu est gravida consequat in nec dolor. Quisque id sapien neque. Vivamus scelerisque augue vel arcu vestibulum rhoncus. In ligula libero, aliquam a varius vel, placerat nec eros. Donec ullamcorper fringilla congue. Donec mi ipsum, dictum vel dui nec, placerat mattis felis. Sed in ex dictum, efficitur ante et, elementum leo. Morbi sed tortor leo. Sed ante orci, rhoncus a tincidunt vel, feugiat ac felis. Vivamus tincidunt eros ut pellentesque vehicula. Duis non semper ex. Proin posuere sodales felis, sed commodo nisi blandit at. Sed a purus augue. Fusce molestie lacinia ipsum, sed volutpat arcu aliquam id. Praesent suscipit, elit a pellentesque sagittis, nunc odio feugiat diam, sed sagittis nibh nunc id quam. Aenean vestibulum, nulla at dictum luctus, mauris neque cursus orci, eu dignissim nunc erat eget ex. Fusce in quam nec justo faucibus suscipit. Proin ligula arcu, facilisis sit amet fermentum imperdiet, mattis sit amet purus. Morbi molestie neque in orci pharetra sodales. In odio erat, scelerisque non fringilla quis, vulputate sit amet metus. Ut purus
.
Burris, Ronald D. Wisdom From Africa: Theological Reflections on the Confessions of St. Augustine. Wipf and Stock, 2016.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent efficitur tincidunt ex id ultrices. Nam eget dui dolor. Vivamus blandit augue ac odio euismod pellentesque. Fusce at dignissim mi. Proin iaculis augue eu est gravida consequat in nec dolor. Quisque id sapien neque. Vivamus scelerisque augue vel arcu vestibulum rhoncus. In ligula libero, aliquam a varius vel, placerat nec eros. Donec ullamcorper fringilla congue. Donec mi ipsum, dictum vel dui nec, placerat mattis felis. Sed in ex dictum, efficitur ante et, elementum leo. Morbi sed tortor leo. Sed ante orci, rhoncus a tincidunt vel, feugiat ac felis. Vivamus tincidunt eros ut pellentesque vehicula. Duis non semper ex. Proin posuere sodales felis, sed commodo nisi blandit at. Sed a purus augue. Fusce molestie lacinia ipsum, sed volutpat arcu aliquam id. Praesent suscipit, elit a pellentesque sagittis, nunc odio feugiat diam, sed sagittis nibh nunc id quam. Aenean vestibulum, nulla at dictum luctus, mauris neque cursus orci, eu dignissim nunc erat eget ex. Fusce in quam nec justo faucibus suscipit. Proin ligula arcu, facilisis sit amet fermentum imperdiet, mattis sit amet purus. Morbi molestie neque in orci pharetra sodales. In odio erat, scelerisque non fringilla quis, vulputate sit amet metus. Ut purus
Chuang, Christina. “Perfecting the Self: From the Moral Sense to Conscience.” Sophia, vol. 56, no. 3, 2017, pp. 483-500. ProQuest, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0556-7. Accessed 16 March 2019.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent efficitur tincidunt ex id ultrices. Nam eget dui dolor. Vivamus blandit augue ac odio euismod pellentesque. Fusce at dignissim mi. Proin iaculis augue eu est gravida consequat in nec dolor. Quisque id sapien neque. Vivamus scelerisque augue vel arcu vestibulum rhoncus. In ligula libero, aliquam a varius vel, placerat nec eros. Donec ullamcorper fringilla congue. Donec mi ipsum, dictum vel dui nec, placerat mattis felis. Sed in ex dictum, efficitur ante et, elementum leo. Morbi sed tortor leo. Sed ante orci, rhoncus a tincidunt vel, feugiat ac felis. Vivamus tincidunt eros ut pellentesque vehicula. Duis non semper ex. Proin posuere sodales felis, sed commodo nisi blandit at. Sed a purus augue. Fusce molestie lacinia ipsum, sed volutpat arcu aliquam id. Praesent suscipit, elit a pellentesque sagittis, nunc odio feugiat diam, sed sagittis nibh nunc id quam. Aenean vestibulum, nulla at dictum luctus, mauris neque cursus orci, eu dignissim nunc erat eget ex. Fusce in quam nec justo faucibus suscipit. Proin ligula arcu, facilisis sit amet fermentum imperdiet, mattis sit amet purus. Morbi molestie neque in orci pharetra sodales. In odio erat, scelerisque non fringilla quis, vulputate sit amet metus. Ut purus
Fein, Melvyn L. “Social Science and Morality: An Empirical Analysis.” Society, vol. 51, no. 5, 2014, pp. 452-463. ProQuest, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9811-0. Accessed 16 March 2019.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent efficitur tincidunt ex id ultrices. Nam eget dui dolor. Vivamus blandit augue ac odio euismod pellentesque. Fusce at dignissim mi. Proin iaculis augue eu est gravida consequat in nec dolor. Quisque id sapien neque. Vivamus scelerisque augue vel arcu vestibulum rhoncus. In ligula libero, aliquam a varius vel, placerat nec eros. Donec ullamcorper fringilla congue. Donec mi ipsum, dictum vel dui nec, placerat mattis felis. Sed in ex dictum, efficitur ante et, elementum leo. Morbi sed tortor leo. Sed ante orci, rhoncus a tincidunt vel, feugiat ac felis. Vivamus tincidunt eros ut pellentesque vehicula. Duis non semper ex. Proin posuere sodales felis, sed commodo nisi blandit at. Sed a purus augue. Fusce molestie lacinia ipsum, sed volutpat arcu aliquam id. Praesent suscipit, elit a pellentesque sagittis, nunc odio feugiat diam, sed sagittis nibh nunc id quam. Aenean vestibulum, nulla at dictum luctus, mauris neque cursus orci, eu dignissim nunc erat eget ex. Fusce in quam nec justo faucibus suscipit. Proin ligula arcu, facilisis sit amet fermentum imperdiet, mattis sit amet purus. Morbi molestie neque in orci pharetra sodales. In odio erat, scelerisque non fringilla quis, vulputate sit amet metus. Ut purus.
Johnson, Kathryn Ann. “The Social Construction Of Emotions In The Bhagavad Gita.” Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 35, no. 4, 2007, pp. 655–679. Wiley Online Library, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00325.x. Accessed 16 March 2019.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent efficitur tincidunt ex id ultrices. Nam eget dui dolor. Vivamus blandit augue ac odio euismod pellentesque. Fusce at dignissim mi. Proin iaculis augue eu est gravida consequat in nec dolor. Quisque id sapien neque. Vivamus scelerisque augue vel arcu vestibulum rhoncus. In ligula libero, aliquam a varius vel, placerat nec eros. Donec ullamcorper fringilla congue. Donec mi ipsum, dictum vel dui nec, placerat mattis felis. Sed in ex dictum, efficitur ante et, elementum leo. Morbi sed tortor leo. Sed ante orci, rhoncus a tincidunt vel, feugiat ac felis. Vivamus tincidunt eros ut pellentesque vehicula. Duis non semper ex. Proin posuere sodales felis, sed commodo nisi blandit at. Sed a purus augue. Fusce molestie lacinia ipsum, sed volutpat arcu aliquam id. Praesent suscipit, elit a pellentesque sagittis, nunc odio feugiat diam, sed sagittis nibh nunc id quam. Aenean vestibulum, nulla at dictum luctus, mauris neque cursus orci, eu dignissim nunc erat eget ex. Fusce in quam nec justo faucibus suscipit. Proin ligula arcu, facilisis sit amet fermentum imperdiet, mattis sit amet purus. Morbi molestie neque in orci pharetra sodales. In odio erat, scelerisque non fringilla quis, vulputate sit amet metus. Ut purus
Krettenauer, Tobias, et al. “The Development of Moral Emotions and Decision-Making from Adolescence to Early Adulthood: A 6-Year Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence, vol. 43, no. 4, 2014, pp. 583-96. ProQuest, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9994-5. Accessed 16 March 2019.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent efficitur tincidunt ex id ultrices. Nam eget dui dolor. Vivamus blandit augue ac odio euismod pellentesque. Fusce at dignissim mi. Proin iaculis augue eu est gravida consequat in nec dolor. Quisque id sapien neque. Vivamus scelerisque augue vel arcu vestibulum rhoncus. In ligula libero, aliquam a varius vel, placerat nec eros. Donec ullamcorper fringilla congue. Donec mi ipsum, dictum vel dui nec, placerat mattis felis. Sed in ex dictum, efficitur ante et, elementum leo. Morbi sed tortor leo. Sed ante orci, rhoncus a tincidunt vel, feugiat ac felis. Vivamus tincidunt eros ut pellentesque vehicula. Duis non semper ex. Proin posuere sodales felis, sed commodo nisi blandit at. Sed a purus augue. Fusce molestie lacinia ipsum, sed volutpat arcu aliquam id. Praesent suscipit, elit a pellentesque sagittis, nunc odio feugiat diam, sed sagittis nibh nunc id quam. Aenean vestibulum, nulla at dictum luctus, mauris neque cursus orci, eu dignissim nunc erat eget ex. Fusce in quam nec justo faucibus suscipit. Proin ligula arcu, facilisis sit amet fermentum imperdiet, mattis sit amet purus. Morbi molestie neque in orci pharetra sodales. In odio erat, scelerisque non fringilla quis, vulputate sit amet metus. Ut purus.
Kumar, Victor. “Moral Vindications.” Cognition, vol. 167, Oct. 2017, pp. 124–134. ScienceDirect, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.005. Accessed 16 March 2019.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent efficitur tincidunt ex id ultrices. Nam eget dui dolor. Vivamus blandit augue ac odio euismod pellentesque. Fusce at dignissim mi. Proin iaculis augue eu est gravida consequat in nec dolor. Quisque id sapien neque. Vivamus scelerisque augue vel arcu vestibulum rhoncus. In ligula libero, aliquam a varius vel, placerat nec eros. Donec ullamcorper fringilla congue. Donec mi ipsum, dictum vel dui nec, placerat mattis felis. Sed in ex dictum, efficitur ante et, elementum leo. Morbi sed tortor leo. Sed ante orci, rhoncus a tincidunt vel, feugiat ac felis. Vivamus tincidunt eros ut pellentesque vehicula. Duis non semper ex. Proin posuere sodales felis, sed commodo nisi blandit at. Sed a purus augue. Fusce molestie lacinia ipsum, sed volutpat arcu aliquam id. Praesent suscipit, elit a pellentesque sagittis, nunc odio feugiat diam, sed sagittis nibh nunc id quam. Aenean vestibulum, nulla at dictum luctus, mauris neque cursus orci, eu dignissim nunc erat eget ex. Fusce in quam nec justo faucibus suscipit. Proin ligula arcu, facilisis sit amet fermentum imperdiet, mattis sit amet purus. Morbi molestie neque in orci pharetra sodales. In odio erat, scelerisque non fringilla quis, vulputate sit amet metus. Ut purus
Molden, Daniel C, and Carol S Dweck. “Finding ‘Meaning’ in Psychology: A Lay Theories Approach to Self-Regulation, Social Perception, and Social Development.” American Psychologist, vol. 61, Apr. 2006, pp. 192–203. EBSCOhost, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192. Accessed 16 March 2019.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent efficitur tincidunt ex id ultrices. Nam eget dui dolor. Vivamus blandit augue ac odio euismod pellentesque. Fusce at dignissim mi. Proin iaculis augue eu est gravida consequat in nec dolor. Quisque id sapien neque. Vivamus scelerisque augue vel arcu vestibulum rhoncus. In ligula libero, aliquam a varius vel, placerat nec eros. Donec ullamcorper fringilla congue. Donec mi ipsum, dictum vel dui nec, placerat mattis felis. Sed in ex dictum, efficitur ante et, elementum leo. Morbi sed tortor leo. Sed ante orci, rhoncus a tincidunt vel, feugiat ac felis. Vivamus tincidunt eros ut pellentesque vehicula. Duis non semper ex. Proin posuere sodales felis, sed commodo nisi blandit at. Sed a purus augue. Fusce molestie lacinia ipsum, sed volutpat arcu aliquam id. Praesent suscipit, elit a pellentesque sagittis, nunc odio feugiat diam, sed sagittis nibh nunc id quam. Aenean vestibulum, nulla at dictum luctus, mauris neque cursus orci, eu dignissim nunc erat eget ex. Fusce in quam nec justo faucibus suscipit. Proin ligula arcu, facilisis sit amet fermentum imperdiet, mattis sit amet purus. Morbi molestie neque in orci pharetra sodales. In odio erat, scelerisque non fringilla quis, vulputate sit amet metus. Ut purus.
Rogers, Glen. “Rethinking Moral Growth in College and Beyond.” Journal of Moral Education, vol. 31, no. 3, Sept. 2002, pp. 325–338. EBSCOhost, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305724022000008142. Accessed 16 March 2019.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Praesent efficitur tincidunt ex id ultrices. Nam eget dui dolor. Vivamus blandit augue ac odio euismod pellentesque. Fusce at dignissim mi. Proin iaculis augue eu est gravida consequat in nec dolor. Quisque id sapien neque. Vivamus scelerisque augue vel arcu vestibulum rhoncus. In ligula libero, aliquam a varius vel, placerat nec eros. Donec ullamcorper fringilla congue. Donec mi ipsum, dictum vel dui nec, placerat mattis felis. Sed in ex dictum, efficitur ante et, elementum leo. Morbi sed tortor leo. Sed ante orci, rhoncus a tincidunt vel, feugiat ac felis. Vivamus tincidunt eros ut pellentesque vehicula. Duis non semper ex. Proin posuere sodales felis, sed commodo nisi blandit at. Sed a purus augue. Fusce molestie lacinia ipsum, sed volutpat arcu aliquam id. Praesent suscipit, elit a pellentesque sagittis, nunc odio feugiat diam, sed sagittis nibh nunc id quam. Aenean vestibulum, nulla at dictum luctus, mauris neque cursus orci, eu dignissim nunc erat eget ex. Fusce in quam nec justo faucibus suscipit. Proin ligula arcu, facilisis sit amet fermentum imperdiet, mattis sit amet purus. Morbi molestie neque in orci pharetra sodales. In odio erat, scelerisque non fringilla quis, vulputate sit amet metus. Ut purus.
ENGL 205: Long Paper Assignment: 300 pts
due by midnight on Friday, April 16
(file must be in DOC, DOCX, or RTF format)
Examining differences between texts often generates significant insight, especially when there is much in
common. For example, while both the Jacob of Genesis and Arjuna come face to face with a divine being,
what do we make of the fact that Jacob wrestled and struggled physically and Arjuna engages in a
philosophical debate?
Your job is to examine two authors/texts and discern what significant meaning is generated by a meaningful
difference. In choosing your texts, you must identify a significant similarity that allows the difference to
highlight a meaningful idea.
In the above example, the significant similarity is that both Genesis and Bhagavad Gita feature characters
having face-to-face meetings with a deity. That similarity marks a significant area of comparison.
The difference between a physical struggle and a mental struggle then is an area of meaningful
comparison. The thesis would be your answer to the question “what do we make of that difference?”
or “what is the significance of that difference?” or “What does that difference teach me?”.
Each student will write a 2,600-word essay (approx. 8 pages, properly formatted) based on one of the
following choices:
1) Narrative
Compare/Contrast TWO of the following:
• Beowulf
• Don Quixote
• Sunjata
• Tale of Genji
• The Thousand and One Nights
2) Poetry
Compare/contrast TWO of the following:
• a selection from The Classic of Poetry
• Francis Petrarch
• A Tang Poet (Li Bo, or Du Fu)
3) Religion/Philosophy
Compare/contrast TWO of the following:
• Augustine’s Confessions
• Bhagavad-Gita
• Confucius Analects
• The Qu’ran
Specifications:
Your paper must…
be 2,600 words long (NOT COUNTING WORKS CITED PAGE) (approx. 8 pages)
quote, summarize, and/or paraphrase from the following sources:
o the two primary sources—(the literary text or texts you are analyzing)
o at least 2 books/ebooks (secondary sources)
o at least 5 peer-reviewed articles from scholarly literary journals (only one article from The
Explicator is allowed). Book reviews do not count. (secondary sources)
have a descriptive title
provide a reason for comparing the two texts in the introduction
contain a clear interpretive thesis statement that summarizes your conclusions
o remember that your thesis claim should be specific and significant
explain and support its main points with specific examples and/or quotations from the texts
use the alternating format for compare/contrast papers rather than the block format (see below)
contain unified, coherent, well-developed paragraphs with strong topic sentences
cite the literary texts in proper MLA documentation format
be formatted according to the MLA guidelines
be submitted in Blackboard on time.
Structure Notes for Compare/Contrast Papers
There are two ways to organize compare/contrast papers.
Do NOT use this format:
Block: organized by texts
A. Introduction and Thesis
B. Background Information
C. Stuff about Text A
a. Point 1
b. Point 2
c. Point 3…
D. Stuff about Text B
a. Point 1
b. Point 2
c. Point 3…
E. Conclusion
DO use this format:
Alternating: organized by ideas/points
A. Introduction and Thesis
B. Very Brief Background Material, if
appropriate (Background may be historical,
thematic, or theoretical, depending on the
topic selected. Make sure that it is relevant to
the argument that follows).
C. Analysis
a. Idea 1 (point of comparison)
i. Discuss BOTH texts.
b. Idea 2
i. Discuss BOTH texts.
c. and so on…
D. Conclusion
Please note that letters and numbers in this outline refer
to sections of your paper, not paragraphs. Each section
may include one or more paragraphs.
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality
Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.
We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.