essay expert
BUSI 511
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
essay expert
Just from $13/Page
Research Project – Draft Instructions
Using your research and Outline, your group will work collaboratively on the Draft of the 4,500–6,000-word paper, complying with the formatting and content instructions below.
Format
· 4,500–6,000 words, double-spaced, not including title and reference pages
· Times New Roman, 12-point font
· Left justified
· One-inch margins
· Current APA format
· Numbered pages
· At least 20 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed journals, each less than 10 years old
· Block quotations for any quotes more than 40 words:
· Single-spaced with a double space separating quotes
· Indented 5 spaces from the left margin
· No quotation marks
· Reference page in current APA format including active URL links
· Single spacing between references and double spacing within the reference
Content
· A title page that includes:
· “Running head:” and page number (right aligned)
· Course number and name
· Case name
· Group number and all group member names
· Date submitted
· “Respectfully submitted to: (Instructor’s Name)”
· Abstract (in block format)
· Content of your topic and/or paper (review the associated grading rubric)
· Use concepts from the textbook that are related to your topic, including page numbers where the concepts may be found. Credit will only be earned for concepts supported by page numbers from the textbook. (Essentially, this is accomplished through integration of the relevant course content, using properly formatted, current APA citations.)
· Use in-text citations in current APA format to credit sources listed in the reference list as appropriate.
· Conclusion
· References
Plagiarism
Plagiarism will not be tolerated. Plagiarism commonly occurs when the student utilizes an author’s words without properly attributing the source. All sources must be referenced. No cutting and pasting or copying is appropriate unless quoting. Purchasing papers of any form will result in automatic failure for the course and a recommendation for expulsion.
One group member must submit this assignment by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 5.
Page 2 of 2
BUSI 511
Research Project (Final Document Draft) Grading Rubric (60 Points)
|
Criteria
|
Levels of Achievement
|
|
Total Points
|
|
Content 70%
|
|
Advanced
|
|
Proficient
|
|
Developing
|
|
Not Present
|
|
Abstract
6 points
|
Points: 6
· All required information is included.
· No extraneous information is included; formatting is correct.
|
Points: 5
· All required information is included.
· Some extraneous information is included; formatting is correct.
|
Points: 1 to 4
· Some required information is included.
· Extraneous information is included; formatting is not correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
|
Introduction
6 points
|
Points: 6
· Background information is engaging and leads to a clear purpose/thesis statement.
· Relevance to course/topic is articulated well.
· Research question(s) or purpose statement is clear and concise.
· Two or 3 main discussion points of the literature review are clearly identified in the purpose statement.
|
Points: 5
· Background information is at times unclear or uninteresting.
· Relevance to course/topic could be more clearly articulated.
· Research question(s) or purpose statement could be stated more clearly and concisely.
· Main discussion points could be more clearly articulated.
|
Points: 1 to 4
· Background information is not clearly articulated.
· Relevance to course/topic is unclear.
· Research question(s) or purpose statement is unidentifiable.
· Main discussion points are not identified in the purpose statement.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
Content
6 points
|
Points: 6
· Thorough comparison and contrast of findings are provided and relate to the main discussion points in the order of their appearance in the purpose statement.
· Focus is on research findings.
· Gaps and controversies that exist in the literature are clearly discussed.
|
Points: 5
· Comparison and contrast of the findings are provided but lack thoroughness.
· Discussion of findings could relate better to the main discussion points in the purpose statement.
· Gaps and controversies in the literature are discussed, but clarity could be enhanced.
|
Points: 1 to 4
· Comparison and contrast of findings are lacking.
· Discussion of findings does not relate well to the main discussion points in the purpose statement.
· Gaps (what is unknown and needs to be researched) and controversies that exist in the literature are not discussed.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
Conclusion
6 points
|
Points: 6
· A summary of the main points is clearly articulated.
· Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are logical, relevant, and clear.
· Areas of future research are clearly identified.
|
Points: 5
· A summary of the main points is presented, but clarity could be enhanced.
· Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are included but lack logic, relevance, or clarity.
· Areas of future research are identified but lack clarity.
|
Points: 1 to 4
· A summary of the main points is not clearly presented.
· Implications or conclusions related to business practice(s) are absent, illogical, irrelevant, or unclear.
· Areas of future research are not identified.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
Word Count
6 points
|
Points: 6
· The word count is 4,500–6,000.
|
Points: 5
· The word count is 2,000–4,499.
|
Points: 1 to 4
· The word count is 1–1,999.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
References (Number of Sources Utilized)
6 points
|
Points: 6
· A total of 20 or more scholarly articles from peer-reviewed sources is included.
|
Points: 5
A total of 15–19 more scholarly articles from peer-reviewed sources are included.
|
Points: 1 to 4
· Less than 15 scholarly articles from peer-reviewed sources are included.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
SafeAssign Score
6 points
|
Points: 6
· Less than 10% match.
|
Points: 5
· A match of 11–15 %.
|
Points: 1 to 4
· More than 15% match.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
Structure 30%
|
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
|
Title Page
3 points
|
Points: 3
· All required information is included.
· No extraneous information is included.
|
Points: 2
· All required information is included.
· Some extraneous information is included.
|
Points: 1
· Some required information is included.
· Extraneous information is included.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
Logical Flow
3 points
|
Points: 3
· The reader is guided smoothly through the logically arranged paper.
· Current APA level headings are used.
· No headings are left alone at the bottom of a page.
|
Points: 2
· The overall arrangement is logical but is occasionally difficult to follow.
· A minor formatting error or 2 are noted in the headings.
· No headings are left alone at the bottom of a page.
|
Points: 1
· The arrangement of content is haphazard and difficult to follow.
· Headings are not present or are formatted inappropriately.
· One (or more) heading is alone at the bottom of a page.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
Total Points
|
/60
|
|
Font, Margins
and
Spacing
|
Points: 3
· Times New Roman or Arial is used.
· A margin of 1 1/2 inch is used on the left border; margins of 1 inch are used on the top, right, and bottom borders.
· Page number and page header are inserted at the top of each page.
· Double-spacing is used between all lines.
· There is only 1 space between sentences.
· Paragraphs are indented 5 spaces.
|
Points: 2
· Times New Roman or Arial is used through most of the document.
· A margin of 1 1/2 inch is used on the left border; margins of 1 inch are used on the top, right, and bottom borders.
· Page number and page header are absent or typed rather than inserted at the top of each page.
· Double-spacing is used between most lines.
· There is only 1 space between sentences.
· Paragraphs are indented 5 spaces.
|
Points: 1
· Times New Roman or Arial is not used.
· A margin of 1 1/2 inch is not used on the left border; margins of 1 inch are not used on the top, right, and bottom borders.
· Page number and page header are absent or typed rather than inserted at the top of each page.
· Double-spacing is not used consistently between lines.
· There is often more than 1 space between sentences.
· Paragraphs are not indented 5 spaces.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
References (Formatting)
|
Points: 4
· Proper formatting is used throughout the reference list.
· Each reference has a matching citation(s).
|
Points: 3
· A minor formatting error or 2 are noted in the reference list.
· Each reference has a matching citation(s).
|
Points: 1 to 2
· Multiple formatting errors occurred in the reference list.
· One or more reference does not have a matching citation.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
|
Spelling/Grammar
|
Points: 5
· Spelling and grammar are correct.
|
Points: 4
· Spelling and grammar are mostly correct with only 1–2 errors noted.
|
Points: 1 to 3
· Spelling and grammar require further review with 3–6 errors noted.
|
Points: 0
· Not Present
