consider the insights they provide on comprehensive,
integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the
Mental Status Examination
B
–
6
and
Simulation
Scenario
–
Adolescent Risk Assessment
videos.
·
Watch the YMH Boston
Vignette 5
video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for
your Discussion post.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Based on the YMH Boston
Vignette 5
video, post answers to the following questions:
·
What did the practitioner do well? In
what areas can the practitioner improve?
·
At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
·
What would be your
next
question, and why?
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in
the YMH Boston video.
·
Explain why a thorough psychi
atric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
·
Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the
psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
·
Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolesce
nts that may not be used
when treating adults.
·
Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
Support your response with at least three peer
–
reviewed, evidence
–
based sources and explain why each
of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. A
ttach the PDFs of your sources.
Discussion Question
Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment
To Prepare
·
Review the Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on comprehensive,
integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the
Mental Status Examination
B
–
6
and
Simulation
Scenario
–
Adolescent Risk Assessment
videos.
·
Watch the YMH Boston
Vignette 5
video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for
your Discussion post.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Based on the YMH Boston
Vignette 5
video, post answers to the following questions:
·
What did the practitioner do well? In
what areas can the practitioner improve?
·
At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
·
What would be your
next
question, and why?
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in
the YMH Boston video.
·
Explain why a thorough psychi
atric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
·
Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the
psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
·
Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolesce
nts that may not be used
when treating adults.
·
Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
Support your response with at least three peer
–
reviewed, evidence
–
based sources and explain why each
of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. A
ttach the PDFs of your sources.
Discussion Question
Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment
To Prepare
Review the Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on comprehensive,
integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the Mental Status Examination B-6 and Simulation
Scenario-Adolescent Risk Assessment videos.
Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for
your Discussion post.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions:
What did the practitioner do well? In what areas can the practitioner improve?
At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
What would be your next question, and why?
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in
the YMH Boston video.
Explain why a thorough psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the
psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolescents that may not be used
when treating adults.
Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each
of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.).
Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 31, “Child Psychiatry”
RUBRIC
TO FOLLOW
Ex
c
elle
nt
Good
Poor
Main Posting:
Response to the Di
scussion
question is reflective
with c
ritical analysis and
synthesis
representative
of
knowledge gained from the course
readings for
the
module
and current
credible sources
.
4
0
(40%)
–
44
(44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Di
scussion
question(s)
Is reflective with critical analysis and
synthesis
representative of knowledge
gained
from the course readings for the
module
and current credible sources
No less than
7
5
% of post has
exceptional depth
and breadth
Supported by at le
ast three current
credible sources
3
5
(35%)
–
3
9
(39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion
question(s)
Is somewhat reflective with critical
analysis and synthesis representative of
knowledge gained from the course
readings for the module
50% of the post h
as exceptional depth
and breadth
Supported by at least three credible
references
31
(31%)
–
34
(34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion
question(s)
One to two
criteria
are not addressed
or are superficially addressed
Is somewhat lacking reflection and
critical analysis and synthesis
Somewhat represents knowledge
gained from the course readings for the
module
Post is supported by fewer than two
credible references
0
(0%)
–
30
(30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion
question(s)
Lacks depth or superfici
ally addresses
criteria
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and
synthesis
Does not represent knowledge gained
from the course readings for the module
Contains only one or no credible
references
Main Posting:
Writing
6
(6%)
– 6 (6%)
Written clearly
and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling
er
rors
Adheres to current APA manual writing
rules and style
5
(5%)
– 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or
spelling errors
Adheres to current APA
manual writing rules and style
with minor errors
4
(4%)
– 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or
grammatical er
rors
Contains some APA formatting errors
0 (0%) – 3
(3%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or
grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA
manual writing rules and style
Main Posting:
Timely and full
participation
9
(9%)
–
10
(10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full,
and active participation
Posts main Discussion by due
date
8
(8%)
– 8 (8%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
Meets requirements for full
participation
7
(7%)
– 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full
participation
Does not post main Discussion by due
date
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth.
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.
RUBRIC TO FOLLOW
Excelle
nt
Good
Poor
Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective
with
critical analysis and synthesis
representative
of knowledge gained from the course readings for
the module and current credible sources.
40
(40%)
–
44
(44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Di
scussion
question(s)
Is reflective with critical analysis and
synthesis representative of knowledge
gained from the course readings for the
module and current credible sources
No less than 75% of post has
exceptional depth and breadth
Supported by at le
ast three current
credible sources
35
(35%)
–
39
(39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion
question(s)
Is somewhat reflective with critical
analysis and synthesis representative of
knowledge gained from the course
readings for the module
50% of the post h
as exceptional depth
and breadth
Supported by at least three credible
references
31
(31%)
–
34
(34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion
question(s)
One to two
criteria
are not addressed
or are superficially addressed
Is somewhat lacking reflection and
c
ritical analysis and synthesis
Somewhat represents knowledge
gained from the course readings for the
module
Post is supported by fewer than two
credible references
0
(0%)
–
30
(30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion
question(s)
Lacks depth or superfici
ally addresses
criteria
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and
synthesis
Does not represent knowledge gained
from the course readings for the
module
Contains only one or no credible
references
Main Posting:
Writing
6
(6%)
–
6
(6%)
Written clearly
and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling
errors
Adheres to current APA manual writing
rules and style
5
(5%)
–
5
(5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or
spelling errors
Adheres to current APA manual writing
rules and style
with minor errors
4
(4%)
–
4
(4%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or
grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
0
(0%)
–
3
(3%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or
grammatical er
rors
Does not adhere to current APA
manual writing rules and style
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
9
(9%)
–
10
(10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full,
and active participation
Posts main Discussion by due date
8
(8%)
–
8
(8%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
Meets requirements for full
participation
7
(7%)
–
7
(7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
0
(0%)
–
6
(6%)
Does not meet requirements for full
participation
Does not post main Discussion by due
date
7
(7%)
–
7
(7%)
0
(0%)
–
6
(6%)
RUBRIC TO FOLLOW
Excellent Good Poor
Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective
with critical analysis and synthesis representative
of knowledge gained from the course readings for
the module and current credible sources.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion
question(s)
Is reflective with critical analysis and
synthesis representative of knowledge
gained from the course readings for the
module and current
credible sources
No less than 75% of post has
exceptional depth
and breadth
Supported by at least three current
credible sources
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion
question(s)
Is somewhat reflective with critical
analysis and synthesis representative of
knowledge gained from the course
readings for the module
50% of the post has exceptional depth
and breadth
Supported by at least three credible
references
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion
question(s)
One to two criteria are not addressed
or are superficially addressed
Is somewhat lacking reflection and
critical analysis and synthesis
Somewhat represents knowledge
gained from the course readings for the
module
Post is supported by fewer than two
credible references
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion
question(s)
Lacks depth or superficially addresses
criteria
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and
synthesis
Does not represent knowledge gained
from the course readings for the
module
Contains only one or no credible
references
Main Posting:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling
errors
Adheres to current APA manual writing
rules and style
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or
spelling errors
Adheres to current APA manual writing
rules and style with minor errors
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or
grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or
grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA
manual writing rules and style
Main Posting:
Timely and full
participation
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full,
and active participation
Posts main Discussion by due
date
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
Meets requirements for full
participation
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full
participation
Does not post main Discussion by due
date
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
What Will You Get?
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Premium Quality
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Experienced Writers
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
On-Time Delivery
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
24/7 Customer Support
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Complete Confidentiality
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
Authentic Sources
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Moneyback Guarantee
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
Order Tracking
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Preferred Writer
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Grammar Check Report
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
One Page Summary
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
Plagiarism Report
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Free Features $66FREE
Most Qualified Writer
$10FREE
Plagiarism Scan Report
$10FREE
Unlimited Revisions
$08FREE
Paper Formatting
$05FREE
Cover Page
$05FREE
Referencing & Bibliography
$10FREE
Dedicated User Area
$08FREE
24/7 Order Tracking
$05FREE
Periodic Email Alerts
$05FREE
Our Services
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
On-time Delivery
24/7 Order Tracking
Access to Authentic Sources
Academic Writing
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
Professional Editing
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
Thorough Proofreading
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Thorough Proofreading
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Delegate Your Challenging Writing Tasks to Experienced Professionals
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
We Analyze Your Problem and Offer Customized Writing
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
Clear elicitation of your requirements.
Customized writing as per your needs.
We Mirror Your Guidelines to Deliver Quality Services
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
Proactive analysis of your writing.
Active communication to understand requirements.
We Handle Your Writing Tasks to Ensure Excellent Grades
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.
Thorough research and analysis for every order.
Deliverance of reliable writing service to improve your grades.
