PLEASE SEE RUBRIC ATTACHED AND FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS….THANK YOUBased on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:
- In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.
- In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
- In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:
What is ultimate reality?
What is the nature of the universe?
What is a human being?
What is knowledge?
What is your basis of ethics?
What is the purpose of your existence?
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory
Just from $13/Page
Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials.While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Course Code Class Code
PHI-
4
1
3
V PHI-413V-O
5
0
2
Criteria Percentage
Content 90.0%
Chris@an Perspec@ve of Spirituality and Ethics in
Contrast to Postmodern Rela@vism 30.0%
Scien@sm and Arguments 30.0%
Personal Perspec@ve and Worldview 30.0%
Organiza@on, Effec@veness, and Format 10.0%
Mechanics of Wri@ng (includes spelling,
punctua@on, grammar, language use) 5.0%
Documenta@on of Sources (cita@ons, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style) 5.0%
Total Weightage 100%
1
Assignment Title
Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory
Unsa@sfactory (0.00%)
Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of
postmodern rela@vism is incomplete or insufficient.
Explana@on of scien@sm or the explana@ons of two main
arguments against scien@sm are inaccurate. Details are not
supported.
Worldview ques@ons are not fully answered.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communica@on of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construc@on is used.
Sources are not documented.
2
Total Points
100.0
Less Than Sa@sfactory (
6
5.00%)
Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of
postmodern rela@vism is unclear. Explana@on is not supported by
topic study materials.
Descrip@on of scien@sm is accurate. Explana@ons of two main
arguments against scien@sm are unclear. Details are not clearly
supported by topic study materials.
Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered but is lacking a
personal connec@on or clarity.
Frequent and repe@@ve mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are
present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Documenta@on of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous forma]ng
errors.
3
Sa@sfactory (
7
5.00%)
Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of
postmodern rela@vism is clear. Explana@on is not supported by
topic study materials.
Explana@on of scien@sm is clear. Explana@ons of two main
arguments against scien@sm are clear. Details are supported by
topic study materials.
Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered with personal
connec@on.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not
overly distrac@ng to the reader. Correct and varied sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some forma]ng errors may be present.
4
Good (85.00%)
Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of
postmodern rela@vism is clear and detailed. Explana@on is
supported by topic study materials.
Explana@on of scien@sm is clear and accurate. Explana@ons of
two main arguments against scien@sm are clear. Details are
clearly supported by topic study materials.
Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered clearly and with
personal connec@on.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be
present. The writer uses a variety of effec@ve sentence structures
and figures of speech.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
and format is mostly correct.
5
Excellent (100.00%) Comments
Explana@on of the Chris@an perspec@ve of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspec@ve of
postmodern rela@vism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep
understanding of the subject. Explana@on is supported by topic
study materials.
Explana@on of scien@sm is clear and accurate. Explana@ons of
two main arguments against scien@sm are clear and insighcul.
Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.
Each of the worldview ques@ons is answered clearly and with
deep personal insight.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, wriden, academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate
to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
6
Points Earned
7
