Two-part finance question – calculate and evaluate financial
The subjoined is a abridgment of accomplishment data for the ABC Corporation aggravate a three-year time:
| (in millions) | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
| Sales | 34,734 | 39,304 | 42,680 |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 33,550 | 37,852 | 40,648 |
| Net Income | 1,184 | 1,452 | 2,032 |
| Assets | 25,654 | 27,385 | 29,903 |
| Total Debt | 11,695 | 10,498 | 13,926 |
| Equity | 15,654 | 15,220 | 14,727 |
| Operating Cash Flow | 1,998 | 2,378 | 3,186 |
| Investment Cash Flow | -2,781 | -3,419 | -4,049 |
| Financing Cash Flow | -692 | -287 | -244 |
Based upon the advice granted, calculate the subjoined:
- Profit loophole on sales
- Return on assets
- Return on equity
- Total something-due to aggregate assets
- Total asset turnover
Explain and evaluate your results as they pertain to useability, something-due, and asset turnaggravate for the gang aggravate a three-year time.
Part Two: Issues and Interests of Investors and Other Stakeholders; Dissection of Gang Performance
Required:
- Identify two items or issues that cannot be acquired from the financial statements of General Motors and Ford. Explain why these items or issues would be of regard to investors and other stakeholders. In your rationale, address the local interests of the contrariant users of financial statements.
- Compare and contrast Gneral Motros and Ford in conditions of how well-behaved-behaved or how poorly they are performing in the areas of use, something-due, and asset turnover. Use mismisappropriate ratios in your dissection. Indicate strategies for feasible advancement in each area.