SOCW 6311 & 6070 Wk 1 Discussions


  

Discussion1: Characteristics, Challenges, and Opportunities of Evidence-Based Design

Consider the forthcoming quotation: “Often times, implicit users of lore recognition are unconcerned to those who do the lore, and therefore a great gap ensues between lore recognition and exercise behaviors” (Barwick, M., Boudell, K., Stasiulis, E., Ferguson, H., Blase, K., & Fixsen, D., 2005). Gregarious productioners must production to obstruct the gap perceived by the authors of this repeat.

In your anterior lore series, you addressed the concept of testimony-grounded exercise. However, it is main not to sink into a custom of using the promise “evidence-grounded exercise” outside a absolved intelligence of its import. In detail, it is main to know what standards of testimony must be to collocate an exercise or a program as testimony grounded. In this assignment, you are to release your intelligence of the truth of testimony-grounded exercise and dissect the challenges and opportunities for implementing testimony-grounded exercise in your ordinary gregarious production exercise.

To furnish for this Discussion, decipher the Learning Instrument that furnish advice environing divergent aspects of the testimony-grounded exercise concept. As you decipher, cogitate how testimony-grounded exercise or testimony- grounded programs virtue be used in a gregarious production exercise where you production or where you had a practicum test.

· Post a patronymic of the distinguishing characteristics of testimonyd-grounded exercise. 

· Then furnish an evaluation of factors that virtue buttress or hinder your efforts in adopting testimony-grounded exercise or testimony-grounded programs.

References (use 3 or past)

 Document: Thyer, B. (2010). Introductory principles of gregarious production lore. In B. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of gregarious production lore methods (2nd ed., pp.1–8). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. (PDF)

Copyright 2010 by Sage Publications, Inc.

Reprinted by license of Sage Publications, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance Center.

Document: Cooney, S. M., Huser, C. M., Small, S., & O’Connor, C. (2007). Evidence-grounded programs: An overview. What Works, Wisconsin —Research to Exercise Series, (6), 1–8. Retrieved from http://whatworks.uwex.edu/attachment/whatworks_06.pdf (PDF)

Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Madison/Extension.

Document: O’Connor, C., Small, S. A., & Cooney, S. M. (2007). Program loyalty and adaptation: Meeting national needs outside compromising program virtue. What Works, Wisconsin —Research to Exercise Series, (4), 1–6. Retrieved from http://whatworks.uwex.edu/attachment/whatworks_04.pdf (PDF)

Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Madison/Extension.

Document: Small, S. A., Cooney, S. M., Eastman G. & O’Connor, C. (2007). Guidelines for selecting an testimony-grounded program: Balancing sympathy needs, program power, and organizational instrument. What Works, Wisconsin —Research to Exercise Series, (3), 1–6. Retrieved from whatworks.uwex.edu/attachment/whatworks_03.pdf (PDF)

Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Madison/Extension.

University of Wisconsin Extension. (2007). Lore to exercise tidings briefs. Retrieved from http://whatworks.uwex.edu/Pages/1researchbriefs.html

Document: Small, S. A., Reynolds, A. J., O’Connor, C., & Cooney, S. M. (2005). What productions, Wisconsin: What skill tells us environing cost-effective programs for youthful offense interruption. Retrieved from http://whatworks.uwex.edu/attachment/whatworkswisconsin.pdf (PDF)

Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Madison/Extension.

Whittaker, J. K. (2009). Evidence-grounded exercise and services for high-risk youth: A North American perspective on the challenges of integration for plan, exercise and lore. Child & Family Gregarious Work, 14(2), 166–177.

Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Discussion 2: Start and Management: What Is the Difference?

Leadership and conduct in gregarious agencies are environing starting things up, getting them performed, and maintenance them emotional.

—Armand Lauffer

Leadership and management are two promises that are used interchangeably but illustrate divergent roles that entertain divergent functions. Intelligence the differences and similarities is leading for gregarious production administrators as they enucleate start strategies amid organizations. Intelligence the functions associated delay start and conduct roles can wave how gregarious productioners manage and production delay colleagues in authoritative exercise. As you furnish for this Discussion, cogitate how your intelligence of start and conduct roles virtue pretend you when you pretend a supervisory pose.

· Post an segregation of the similarities and differences of start and conduct roles as they report to civilized services organizations. 

· Include how your intelligence of these roles may pretend you as you pretend a supervisory pose.

References (use 2 or past)

Lauffer, A. (2011). Understanding your gregarious exercise (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage.

Mulroy, E. A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on the gregarious environment to train conduct and sympathy perspectives: An organization-in-environment admittance. Administration in Gregarious Work, 28(1), 77–96.

Mulroy, E. A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on the gregarious environment to train conduct and sympathy perspectives: An organization-in-environment admittance. Administration in Gregarious Work, 28(1), 77–96.