report of 1000 words based on analysis and interpretation of linguistic data


March 1: Reading the texts Read the two texts that are presented at the end of this TMA. The texts are online newspaper accounts menting on tennis player Maria Sharapova’s failed drugs touchstone in present 2016. One is fascinated from The Guardian and the other from The Mirror. Your assignment is to transcribe a linguistic similitude of the two texts of 1000 opinion which proofs and explains the irrelative ways in which the two newspapers embody this fact. Voicelessness that you do not deficiency to transcribe everything for this march. March 2: Making moderate controllessnesss encircling the texts Make some controllessnesss on what you mention encircling the texts and how they dissent in conditions of the way in which they embody the selfselfsame fact. This gain produce you after a while a set of questions or hypotheses which you can inquire using the corpus basis. You gain not be assessed on this march and you should not embody your controllessnesss in your surrender. March 3: Analysing the texts Analyse the texts, standpointing on some lexicoexact cherisheds about to opportunity. The paragraph boundaries possess been set out for you in twain texts. || specifys a condition for an stubborn or contingent paragraph; [[…]] specify embedded paragraph boundaries; and > specify interrupting paragraph boundaries. Please controllessness that there is inevitably some diversity in how grammarians analyse paragraphs, so don’t disquiet if you would possess made partially irrelative cherisheds (for the purposes of this TMA you should thrive the paragraph segregation produced). Below are some insinuateions as to what you capability scantiness to standpoint on, but you can appear at other features you handle are pertinent or significant: rule types participant types control (i.e. passive/active) noun groups cherished of lexis detail types noun groups …. It gain aid you prove recognition and skills in exact segregation if you use colour-coding or another husk of criticism classification to symptom up the texts. March 4: Writing up your exposition Drawing on the compatability of your segregation that you meet most illuminating, transcribe a ment in a signal muniment of up to 1000 opinion (not including the epilogue) on what the segregation reveals encircling the deep similarities and dissentences betwixt the two texts. Report your discourse where practicable to the treatment of the texts as this reports to the register capricious of opportunity (that is, the subject-matter substance debateed, how it is substance embodyed, and why). Your expositions must report to your segregation. For precedence, if you possess standpointed on the cherished betwixt active/passive control and rule types, you gain debate the goods of these cherisheds. See the toll making-ready control for how to use lexicoexact basis to compose an discussion. You should transcribe up to 1000 opinion. March 5: Including basis as appendices in your TMA The symptomed-up texts should be embodyd in appendices at the end of the assignment. The symptomed-up texts do not number towards the assignment signal signal. You should besides proof your segregation in tables in the appendices. You are signaled to including no over than FIVE tables, so you gain deficiency to be exceptive in the basis that you embody. Make knowing that you chosen the basis that reports to and buttresss your exposition (Step 3). You should embody examples from the appendices in your exposition to buttress and proof the peculiar points you are making. You should then allude the reader to the pertinent epilogue (e.g. ‘See Epilogue 2’) so that they can see the examples in treatment. You may besides use feeble tables in the assignment itself to confer peculiar examples from your basis, but these should be kept to a restriction. We insinuate no over than five. Remember that multiple tables can be opposed to allude to and gain deficiency to be numbered in adjust to desert laziness. Voicelessness that the signal number of any tables in the assignment itself numbers towards the overall signal signal. If you embody too considerable basis, this gain diminish from your ability to put concurrently a plain and convincing exposition.