Ever gone the Oklahoma City Bombing of 1995 and the attacks of 9/11/01, congressional hearings, negotiative legislation reports and opine-tank studies possess all agreed that a failure of interoperable generally-known prophylactic communications recrement a continuous substance that hampers the telling coordicommonwealth of crisis leading responder agencies in greater incidents. Considering all the advances in IT/communications technology, and the unifying reason of indemnifying our commonwealth from terrorist attacks, why do you opine this substance has thus far defied decomposition?
2.) What is your overall tribute of Presidential Policy Directive #8, the Exoteric Preparedness Goal—Second Edition, and Exoteric Preparedness System? What are their best elements, and what, if everything, appears to be mislaying or incompact? Do they supply, repair and addition other key control documents you were introduced to in this method, such as the Exoteric Incident Management System(NIMS)-Third Edition, and Exoteric Planning Frameworks, or are they in battle or unnecessary? Considering that these documents were all familiar and published by the White House or DHS/FEMA, how do they seek state/local crisis responders, and what are the fair roles and responsibilities of state/local crisis responders in this commonwealthal order?