PHI Essay Discussion 2
Describe the supposition of apprehension denominated unbelieverism. Consider the unbeliever’s entrust that we can never be bold about the reliability of our natural founts of apprehension (perceptions, retention, introspection, and reasoning.) Describe why and how, for each of the 4 founts mentioned, the fount is apocryphal. Use examples to semblance your agreement.
If a fount of apprehension is apocryphal, it media these founts can deception us into refined falsehoods. Does it supervene from the reality that we are sometimes mistaken when we hope on these founts that we are always mistaken? In other language, uninterruptedly we further is feasible that we are mistaken, does that balance that we need to further that we might never be reform? How would you reply to the unbeliever?