review the material and answer the question. 1-2 pages   

Tyler v. Hillsdale County Sheriff’s Department

Sixth Circuit (2014)

Under federal law, an individual “who has been committed to a mental institution” may not possess a firearm. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4). Specifically, the statute provides:

It shall be unlawful for any person . . . who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or who has been committed to a mental institution . . . to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

Section 922(g) imposes the same firearm restrictions on numerous other groups of individuals, including convicted felons, § 922(g)(1); fugitives, § 922(g)(2); and domestic- violence misdemeanants, § 922(g)(9).

Tyler is a seventy-three-year-old resident of Hillsdale County, Michigan. On January 2, 1986, a state probate court committed Tyler to a mental institution. Tyler alleges that he underwent an emotionally devastating divorce in 1985 and that he was involuntarily committed because of a risk that he might be suicidal.

In 1985, when Tyler was forty-five years old, Tyler’s wife of twenty- three years served him divorce papers. Prior to filing for divorce, Tyler’s ex-wife allegedly ran away with another man and depleted Tyler’s finances. Tyler felt “overwhelmed” and “sat in the middle of the floor at home pounding his head.” According to a mental-health evaluation submitted by Tyler, Tyler was crying non-stop, not sleeping, depressed, and suicidal at this time. Tyler’s daughters became scared and contacted the police.

The police transported Tyler to the sheriff’s department, where they contacted Tyler’s eighteen-year-old daughter to assist them with the necessary steps to have Tyler receive a psychological evaluation. The probate court found by “clear and convincing evidence” that Tyler was “a person requiring treatment because [he was] mentally ill.” The court also found that Tyler could be “reasonably expected within the near future to intentionally or unintentionally seriously physically injure [himself] or others, and has engaged in an act or acts or made significant threats that are substantially supportive of the expectation.”

In 2012, Tyler visited a psychologist, who determined that Tyler’s prior involuntary commitment “appeared to be a brief reactive depressive episode in response to his wife divorcing him.” The psychologist determined that there was no evidence of mental illness. In about 1999, Tyler remarried, and he maintains a close relationship with his two daughters from his first marriage.

Tyler has been unable to purchase a firearm because of his prior involuntary commitment. He alleges that on February 7, 2011, he attempted to purchase a firearm. The Hillsdale County Sheriff’s Office informed Tyler that he was ineligible to purchase a firearm because the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) indicated that Tyler had previously been committed to a mental institution.

In 2012, Tyler filed suit in federal court, alleging that the enforcement of § 922(g)(4) violates his rights protected by the Federal Constitution. In particular, Tyler alleged that the federal disability scheme constitutes an overbroad infringement on his right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment.

Law & Culture

Professor Banner

Law in Action

ASSIGNMENT SEVEN

Each of these assignments asks you to apply the course material by completing a project or providing advice similar to what an actual law student or lawyer might do. You will conduct research, counsel a client, and outline points of law. Often these assignments require you to review additional, short assigned videos or documents, which are available in the Law in Action folder located in the Files section on Canvas.

In each case, unless specified otherwise, your answers should be as short as possible and as long as necessary.

The assignments must be submitted in a Word document on Canvas by the Due Date listed on the syllabus.

50 points—Excellent (professionally presented, no errors in legal analysis)

40 points—Satisfactory (solid legal analysis; small grammatical or proofreading issues)

30 points—OK (ideas are good but not fully formed; assignment is sloppy)

20 points—Assignment was submitted but includes multiple errors of law and/or grammar and proofreading issues

0 points—Assignment contains multiple mistakes and is not professionally presented or assignment was not submitted

There are 8 LIA assignments in all, each worth 50 points, for a total of 400 course points.

You have seven days to complete each of these assignments. Late assignments will not be accepted without a documented medical or religious excuse. Being sick for one or two days of seven is not an excuse.

Assignment Seven

Review the Documents in the
LIA Assignment Seven
folder, located in the Files section on Canvas. Then, thoroughly answer the following.

Like the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, the Tyler v. Hillsdale case involves competing legal and policy considerations. What are the strongest arguments on both sides of this case? If you were the judge deciding whether Tyler should have access to a firearm, how would you rule based on Constitutional legal principles? What evidence supports your decision (you may use medical evidence, historical evidence, or other facts)?