In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed.


New technology—and the collision of massive technology—merely appears in bloomcare settings following mindful and suggestive examination. The stakes are elevated, and new clinical rules want to volunteer token of substantial contact on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse impartaticists and bloomcare leaders formulate clinical rule strategies. As these strategies are frequently domiciled on technology trends, impartaticists and others possess then benefited from consulting massive examination to impart their thinking.

In this Assignment, you earn critique massive examination focused on the collision of clinical rules. Following critiqueing, you earn incorporate your findings.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and think on the contact of clinical rules on outcomes and efficiencies among the matter of nursing exercitation and bloomcare offer.
  • Conduct a inquiry for novel (among the conclusive 5 years) examination focused on the collision of clinical rules. The examination should procure token to living the use of one fashion of clinical rule to correct outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of particular bloom history or portals to living patients newly diagnosed delay diabetes.”
  • Identify and selecteded 4 peer-reviewed examination subscription from your examination.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages)

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed examination you critiqueed. Format your Assignment as an Annotated Bibliography. Be trusting to address the following:

  • Identify the 4 peer-reviewed examination subscription you critiqueed, citing each in APA format.
  • Summarize each con-over, explaining the correctment to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons conversant from the collision of the clinical rule each peer-reviewed name vivid. Be inequitable and procure examples.
  • In your quittance, synthesize the findings from the 4 peer-reviewed examination name

Select Grid View or List View to qualify the rubric's layout.

Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Discussion_Rubric

  • Grid View
  • List View

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Main Posting

45 (45%) - 50 (50%)

Answers all calibre of the argument interrogation(s) expectations delay thinkive fastidious separation and body of enlightenment gained from the order readings for the module and ordinary trustworthy sources.

Supported by at lowest three ordinary, trustworthy sources.

Written plainly and shortly delay no positive or spelling errors and abundantly concurs to ordinary APA manual answerableness rules and phraseology.

40 (40%) - 44 (44%)

Responds to the argument interrogation(s) and is thinkive delay fastidious separation and body of enlightenment gained from the order readings for the module.

At lowest 75% of shaft has rare profundity and divergency.

Supported by at lowest three trustworthy sources.

Written plainly and shortly delay one or no positive or spelling errors and abundantly concurs to ordinary APA manual answerableness rules and phraseology.

35 (35%) - 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the argument interrogation(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is subordinately scant thinkion and fastidious separation and body.

Somewhat resembles enlightenment gained from the order readings for the module.

Post is cited delay two trustworthy sources.

Written subordinately shortly; may include past than two spelling or positive errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) - 34 (34%)

Does not reply to the argument interrogation(s) adequately.

Lacks profundity or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks thinkion and fastidious separation and body.

Does not resemble enlightenment gained from the order readings for the module.

Contains merely one or no trustworthy sources.

Not written plainly or shortly.

Contains past than two spelling or positive errors.

Does not concur to ordinary APA manual answerableness rules and phraseology.

Main Post: Timeliness

10 (10%) - 10 (10%)

Posts main shaft by day 3.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Does not shaft by day 3.

First Response

17 (17%) - 18 (18%)

Response exhibits body, fastidious thinking, and collision to exercitation settings.

Communication is administrative and reverential to colleagues.

Responses to gratuity interrogations are abundantly answered, if posed.

Provides serene, short opinions and ideas that are livinged by at lowest two literary sources.

Demonstrates body and knowledge of culture objectives.

Response is cogently written in model, edited English.

15 (15%) - 16 (16%)

Response exhibits fastidious thinking and collision to exercitation settings.

Communication is administrative and reverential to colleagues.

Responses to gratuity interrogations are answered, if posed.

Provides serene, short opinions and ideas that are livinged by two or past trustworthy sources.

Response is cogently written in model, edited English.

13 (13%) - 14 (14%)

Response is on theme and may possess some profundity.

Responses shafted in the argument may closing cogent administrative message.

Responses to gratuity interrogations are subordinately answered, if posed.

Response may closing serene, short opinions and ideas, and a few or no trustworthy sources are cited.

0 (0%) - 12 (12%)

Response may not be on theme and closings profundity.

Responses shafted in the argument closing cogent administrative message.

Responses to gratuity interrogations are dropping.

No trustworthy sources are cited.

Second Response

16 (16%) - 17 (17%)

Response exhibits body, fastidious thinking, and collision to exercitation settings.

Communication is administrative and reverential to colleagues.

Responses to gratuity interrogations are abundantly answered, if posed.

Provides serene, short opinions and ideas that are livinged by at lowest two literary sources.

Demonstrates body and knowledge of culture objectives.

Response is cogently written in model, edited English.

14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

Response exhibits fastidious thinking and collision to exercitation settings.

Communication is administrative and reverential to colleagues.

Responses to gratuity interrogations are answered, if posed.

Provides serene, short opinions and ideas that are livinged by two or past trustworthy sources.

Response is cogently written in model, edited English.

12 (12%) - 13 (13%)

Response is on theme and may possess some profundity.

Responses shafted in the argument may closing cogent administrative message.

Responses to gratuity interrogations are subordinately answered, if posed.

Response may closing serene, short opinions and ideas, and a few or no trustworthy sources are cited.

0 (0%) - 11 (11%)

Response may not be on theme and closings profundity.

Responses shafted in the argument closing cogent administrative message.

Responses to gratuity interrogations are dropping.

No trustworthy sources are cited.

Participation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for free-trade by shafting on three contrariant days.

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

0 (0%) - 0 (0%)

Does not converge requirements for free-trade by shafting on 3 contrariant days.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6050_Module04_Week08_Discussion_Rubric