please see attachments

i need to do 2.1.1

2 pages only

citations and references 

Guidelines for Group Human Resource Case Review Assignments

1. Required: A list of participating and non-participating student names. Each group spokesperson shall

submit for their group. Only one submission per group permitted.

2. Required: Complete detailed answers addressing each of the following questions using proper English

and proper APA Style for citations and references.

2.1.1 What are the ethical, legal and human resource issues in this case?

2.1.2 What management and/or HR mistakes were made in this case?

2.1.3 What steps can be taken within this organization to remedy these mistakes?

3. Required: Formatting of submissions:

3.1.1 The question(s) must be repeated in full;

3.1.2 Followed by the group’s narrative response which must include substantively used sources as

well as proper APA Style cited and referenced sources; and

3.1.3 The references used in each narrative response to a question shall follow immediately after

the answer and before proceeding to the next question.

4. Required: More than two “External Authoritative Sources” are required in addition to the textbook for

maximum points on EACH question.

4.1.1 In addition each paragraph and/or each substantive issue addressed in an answer must have

at least one “External Authoritative Sources” cited (not including the text book).

4.1.2 It is unacceptable to have paragraph(s) and/or substantive narrative on issue(s), with zero

sources cited and then have one paragraph or answer contain all “external authoritative sources”

and the text book.

5. Required: Any direct quote in the narrative must include the page or paragraph number in the

citation.

6. Required: It is improper to place a citation/source at the end of a paragraph if material from the

source appears before the last sentence in the paragraph.

7. Required: It is improper to place a citation in the middle of a sentence. One can lead with the source in

the sentence but cannot use a citation within parenthesis except at the end of the sentence.

8. “External Authoritative Sources” for purposes of this course shall mean: books, peer reviewed journal

articles, education and government sites as well as non-partisan national or international organizations (such

as WHO, UNICEF, UNAIDS etc) provided, the foregoing source/material selected has in

text citations and

references to support statements made therein. Under no circumstances are newspapers including the Wall

Street Journal, blogs (regardless of source), editorials, panel discussions and dot com sites to be used. The

foregoing is not considered authoritative for this course.

9. Additional Guidance: I urge student to review the adobe connect session with FIU Libraries and Writing

Center on APA Style formatting and contact them personally if more assistance is needed.

10. Proper Submission Required: The assignment must be posted in the appropriate Assignment Folder.

Grading Rubric:

5- Excellent 4- Good 2-Fair 0-Poor

The issues were answered

in their entirety in the

students’ own words with

sources/citation to support

statements made and not a

string of direct quotes.

The issues were answered
in their entirety in the
students’ own words with
sources/citation to support

statements made; however

there were a few strings of

direct quotes.

The issues were not

answered in their entirety;

however, most of the

content was not the

students’ own words – it

contained an excessive

amount of direct quotes,

opinion/unsupported

statements.

The assigned questions

were not answered in their

entirety and most, if not

all, of the content was a

string of direct quotes,

opinion/unsupported
statements.

4- Excellent 3- Good 1-Fair 0.5- Poor

The student commented in

a substantive way on the

facts of the case study with

supporting sources that

included the USE OF

MORE THAN one

EXTERNAL authoritative

sources.

The student commented

in a substantive way on

the facts of the case study

with supporting sources

that included t

he USE OF AT LEAST

ONE EXTERNAL

authoritative sources.

The student’s

Comments on the facts of

the case study lacked

sufficient support, using

at sources that were not

authoritative.

The student did not

comment on the facts of

the case study. The content

submitted was not

corroborated with

authoritative sources.

2- Excellent 1.5- Good 1- Fair 0- Poor

The submission complies

with the proper APA style

of in-text citations and

references (including page

numbers for each direct

quote) containing no

errors.

The submission complies
with the proper APA style
of in-text citations and
references (including page
numbers for each direct

quote) containing minimal

errors.

The submission does not

fully comply with the

proper APA style of in-

text citations and

references (including

page numbers for each

direct quote) and contains

excessive errors.

The submission does not

comply with the proper

APA style of in-text

citations and references

(including page numbers

for each direct quote).

Human Resources Case II
Adam is an extremely competent grants writer, with an impressive record of personally obtaining grants and developing community coalitions that produce program funding. He has just been promoted to lead a newly created organizational division responsible for acquiring most of the organization’s operating funds through grants and community support. As part of this new division, Adam has hired two experienced assistant grants writers and an administrative assistant. Six months after these appointments, Adam’s boss meets with him to express concern about the long hours and weekends that Adam has continued to work even after the new staff have been added. Adam assures his boss that this situation is temporary as some important grant proposals are nearing completion. Shortly thereafter, one of the assistant grants writers resigns. During her exit interview, she reluctantly admits that Adam’s management style is “not something she could work with.” When pressed for details, she says he seems to have little confidence in either her or the other assistant grants writer and micromanages both writers’ assignments. She says that no matter what she produces, it isn’t good enough for Adam. She had not experienced this kind of criticism in her former positions, where she had successfully acquired many grants. She says she feels she has not been treated as a professional.