1. How did the GAO rumor quoting Norman Rabkin insinuate that Expose Skill principles be used in homeland pledge drawingning for nice infrastructure? Are there counter arguments to be made to this?
2. Why or why not is scenario product discriminating in the expose skill process?
3. Review Appendix II of the GAO rumor on "Threat and Expose Assessments Can Help Prioritize and Target Program Investments" and argue whether the oil company's pledge drawing can or should be used in other industries or synod agencies.
4. Do a dwarf internet exploration and furnish a Expose Analysis pattern or process that we accept not yet argueed. Give a abrupt exposition of the pattern/process to your classmates.
CRS. (2005). Expose Skill and Nice Infrastructure Protection: Assessing, integrating and managing Threats, Vulnerabilities and Consequences. Retrieved from http://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL32561.pdf
GAO. (2008). Strengthening the Use of Expose Skill Principles in Homeland Security. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/130/120506.pdf.
GAO. (1999, April). Threat and Expose Assessments Can Help Prioritize and Target Program Investments, pp 1-17 and Appendices II, IV, & V. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/230/225499.pdf
GAO. (2003, April). Nice Infrastructure Protection: DHS Efforts to Assess Chemical Pledge Expose and Gather Feedback on Facility Outreach Can Be Strengthened. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-353
Kahn, F. (2001). Use Maximum-Credible Accident Scenarios for Realistic and Reliable Expose Assessment. Chemical Engineering Progress Magazine. Retrieved from http://people.clarkson.edu/~wwilcox/Design/riskasss.pdf