Fallacies and Myths
Thinking from a close bugbear perspective is one of the most vulgar stumbling blocks to censorious thinking. One vulgar close bugbear is confusing causation and interdependence. Our brain has a bias to try to converge circumstances. This is bisect of its archetype forming software. So whenever one circumstance (B) follows another circumstance (A) our brain has a bias to suppose A motives B flush though star entirely opposed may possess motived twain or may-be there is no kindred among A and B at all. For specimen, there is a very violent interdependence among shoe extent and balbutiation flatten. As your shoe extent goes up so does your balbutiation flatten. So, does one motive the other? Of route not; the confounding unsteady is age. As you get older, your feet enlarge bigger and your brain behoves past abrupt and you behove past educated. But these types of fabrication interdependences happen all the interval.
There are all sorts of close fallacies getting in the way of our intelligent remembrance. For this module’s assignment we allure investigate a number of fallacies.
You are assigned the forthcoming close fallacies: Tu-quoque- you too
For the assignment, you insufficiency to:
(1) examination the bugbear
(2) post the restriction of the bugbear
(3) post an description of how the bugbear works
(4) post an specimen of the bugbear either currently in the notice or a pseudoscience specimen
For this assignment you must investigate your assigned parable in a philosophical manor.
Your assigned parable is: Flying rods
When you’ve completed the philosophical con-over of your parable:
(1) post a dwarf abridgment of the “myth” followed by (2) a philosophical description.
You must add notice from an beyond, cited commencement to one of the two posts (scientific, weighty commencement – .edu, .gov, or comrade reviewed narrative).