Economics of Energy
As every nation endures the global recession, countries invest on various types of energy sources that offer the maximum benefits. There are many variations on energy that can be used such as solar energy, nuclear energy, wind-generated energy and shale oil reserves. Each type of energy has different economic benefits. At present times, shale oil reserves are to watch out for. Shale oil reserves are usually undeveloped given that the process of extracting its oil is a difficult process. However, the latest technology unfolds the overwhelming potential of shale oil exploration. The accessibility of shale oil resources across the globe and the effect of increased shale oil production have influence that extends further than the rest of competitors in energy industry. In contrast, other sources of energy offer economic benefits as well but only differ with costs incurred.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Economics of Energy: Shale Oil
Just from $13/Page
Get Help With Your Essay
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!
Essay Writing Service
Among all energy sources, nuclear energy helps to reduce air pollution, balance the Earth’s weather, avoid acid rain, and depletion of ozone layer. Nuclear power plants are environment-friendly source of energy. There are many economic benefits of using nuclear power plants. Nuclear power plants are a good source of income while it incurs low costs on operation. In the United States, it is their second largest source of power. Aside from stability in future price, it also avoids the import on fuel. Although the economic benefits of nuclear power are great, the hype on shale oil exploration overshadows the nuclear industry. As many nuclear power plants are offline, most of them would find it easier to build new turbines for gas exploration than repair nuclear reactors. According to the Climate News Network in London, most of the nuclear reactors in the United States and Canada are shutting down since shale gas produces cheaper power (Brown, 2013, para.1). Moreover, the investment costs required for nuclear power plant is higher compared to shale oil exploration. Hence, the economic benefits of shale gas are better than nuclear power. Another source of energy is the solar power. This type of energy captures the photovoltaic cells that transform sunlight into electrical energy. Its edge among other sources of energy is that sunlight is free; hence, its energy is infinitely renewable. In the future, the cost of solar power is expected to decline below market price. To compare solar energy and shale gas, the latter has many variables to consider on its relevant costs such as land costs, drilling costs, corporate overhead and others. Hence, solar energy is more economic than shale gas when it comes to expenditures. Lastly, wind-generated energy is also an alternative source of electricity. Wind turbines convert the wind that passes through the blades into electricity. One of the challenges on wind energy industry is its disadvantage on costs. Its technology needs a higher amount of initial outlay than fossil fuels. Hence, shale gas is more cost-competitive compared to wind-generated electricity.
Economic Costs and Profits of Shale Oil Exploration
Computation for economic costs basically includes explicit costs, real costs and opportunity costs (EconomicConcepts.com, 2012, n.p.). On the other hand, economic profit is the difference between revenue and costs incurred. In this section, the economic costs are cash outlays, opportunity costs, transportation expense to China and Beijing Costs, Insurance and Freight (CFI). Below is a table of the writer’s own model of economic costs and profits of shale exploration (Figure 1). The figures are rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Economic Costs and Profit for Shale Oil Exploration
Total Revenue
$ 12,000,000,000.00
Explicit Costs
Pipeline costs
Materials
$ 8,000,000.00
Miscellaneous Expenses
$ 1,000,000.00
$ 9,000,000.00
Land
(934400 acres x $ 5000 per acre)
$ 4,600,000,000.00
Well Cost
(50 wells x $5,000,000 rate per well)
$ 250,000,000.00
Drilling Costs
$ 14,000,000.00
Transportations Costs (Cost Insurance Freight to Beijing, China)
(6000 trucks x $8000 rate per truck)
$ 48,000,000.00
$ 4,921,000,000.00
Total Explicit Costs
Real Costs
Labor
$ 11,500,000.00
Total Real Cost
$ 11,500,000.00
Opportunity Costs
Opportunity Costs
$ 50,000,000.00
Total Opportunity Costs
$ 50,000,000.00
Total Economic Costs
$ 4,982,500,000.00
Total Economic Profit
$ 7,017,500,000.00
Figure 1. Sample Model of Total Economic Costs and Profit for Shale Oil Exploration
In Figure 1, the figures indicated are merely estimates through extensive research. In the explicit costs, the costs incurred are for pipeline, land, well, drilling and transportations. These are costs that are directly attributed to the shale gas exploration. The estimates used for rate per acre, well, and truck are average computation for each account. Secondly, real cost includes all the labor costs incurred to extract oil from the shale. Lastly, the opportunity cost pertains to the amount which could have been earned using other alternatives such as nuclear power plant and so on. In the illustration, total revenue exceeds the total costs incurred which results to an economic profit of $7 Billion. Hence, the model shows a cash-generating shale oil exploration. The next illustration (Figure 2) shows the extended model of Figure 1.
Expanded Computation for Economic Cost and Profit of Shale Oil Exploration
Total Revenue
$ 12,000,000,000.00
Total Economic Costs
$ 4,982,500,000.00
Other Costs
Decommission Cost
Waste Disposal costs
$ 384,500,000.00
Labor
$ 568,050,000.00
Used-fuel Storage costs
$ 211,230,000.00
$ 1,163,780,000.00
Operation or Fracking Expense
$ 1,230,500,000.00
Construction Expense
$ 805,080,000.00
Total Economic Cost
$ 8,181,860,000.00
Total Economic Profit
$ 3,818,140,000.00
Figure 2. Expanded Computation for Economic Cost and Profit of Shale Oil Exploration
In Figure 2, the amounts from Figure 1 are retained and only the other costs account is added as well as operation or fracking cost and construction expense. The marginal cost is computed by dividing the change in total cost by change in total quantity of shale oil (AmosWEB, 2014, para.4). Hence, $ 8,181,860,000.00 – $ 4,982,500,000.00 is $3199360000. Change in total quantity pertains to the change in output of shale oil extraction. For instance, a company can extract 100,000 tons of shale oil in a year and doubles for the succeeding years. Below is the computation for marginal cost per year.
Change in Costs
Change in Quantity
Marginal Cost
1st year
3199360000
100,000
31993
2nd year
3199360000
200,000
15996
3rd year
3199360000
400,000
7998
4th year
3199360000
800,000
3999
5th year
3199360000
1,600,000
1999
Figure 3. Computation for Marginal Cost
Figure 3 is a chart on computing for marginal cost. The numerator is the change in costs divided by the denominator which is the change in tons of shale oil.
Energy Forecast
Energy Forecast on UAE from 2014 to 2020
Year
Dollar Price per Oil Barrel
Year
Dollar Price per Oil Barrel
2003
26.74
2014
120.76
2004
33.46
2015
128.86
2005
49.49
2016
136.97
2006
61.43
2017
145.07
2007
68.37
2018
153.17
2008
93.78
2019
161.28
2009
61.75
2020
169.38
2010
78.06
2011
106.03
2012
108.9
2013
105.43
Figure 4. Energy Forecast on UAE from 2014 to 2020
In Figure 4, the amounts from the year 2003 up to 2013 are data released by World Bank Commodity Price Data (Knoema, 2013). Following the past trends on Dubai’s oil prices, the next 6 six years are forecasts through the Microsoft Excel’s trend function. The illustration shows a forecast of the increasing oil price in the next 6 years. UAE’s oil price is to increase by $7-$9.
Comparative Energy Forecast on UAE, UK and US
UAE
UK
United States
Year
Dollar Price per Oil Barrel
2003
26.74
28.85
31.11
2004
33.46
38.3
41.44
2005
49.49
54.43
56.44
2006
61.43
65.39
66.04
2007
68.37
72.7
72.28
2008
93.78
97.64
99.56
2009
61.75
61.86
61.65
2010
78.06
79.64
79.43
2011
106.03
110.94
95.05
2012
108.9
111.97
94.16
2013
105.43
108.86
97.94
2014
120.76
123.61
109.21
2015
128.86
131.63
115.36
2016
136.97
139.65
121.52
2017
145.07
147.66
127.67
2018
153.17
155.68
133.83
2019
161.28
163.70
139.98
2020
169.38
171.72
146.14
Figure 5. Comparative Energy Forecast on UAE, UK and US
Figure 6.Bar Graph of Energy Forecast on UAE, UK and US
Figure 5 illustrates the past and future forecasts on the oil prices of UAE, UK and the United States. Using the past trends on oil prices of these countries, a forecast for the next 6 years is made. The same method of computation has been made similar to Figure 5. Its summary on Figure 6, UK has the highest amount of oil price in the next 6 years while UAE falls second. Although United States has usually the highest price of oil in the last 10 years, UK started to lead starting 2012 until now. Hence, both United States and UAE has to improve more in terms of their energy economics to surpass UK’s performance in energy industry.
References
Brown, P. (2013, February 13).Shale gas kills nuclear power | Climate News Network. Retrieved from http://www.climatenewsnetwork.net/2013/02/shale-gas-kills-nuclear-power/>
EconomicConcepts.com (2012).Concept of Economic Costs – Explict Cost – Implict Cost- Real Cost – Oppotunity Cost – Definition and Example – Economicsconcepts.com. RetrievedJanuary24, 2014, from http://economicsconcepts.com/concepts_of_economic_costs.htm>
Knoema (2013, October).Crude Oil Prices Forecast: Long Term to 2025 | Data and Charts – knoema.com. RetrievedJanuary25, 2014, from http://knoema.com/yxptpab/crude-oil-prices-forecast-long-term-to-2025-data-and-charts>
Marginal Cost, AmosWEB Encyclonomic WEB*pedia, http://www.AmosWEB.com, AmosWEB LLC, 2000-2014. Retrieved January 24, 2014>.
