Discussion: Flying Squadron Costs: Assessing Normality ( Table report attached)

Use Microsoft Excel and StatDisk to adequate the Flying Squadron Costs consultation for the aircraft expression listed beneath: 

adequate the costs using the B-52 data; use the Kadena basis object in your z-mandible and verisimilitude calculations.

Report your rates to two decimal places (i.e., 0.12) negative for verisimilitude. Report verisimilitude rates to filthy decimal places (i.e. p = 0.1234). 

Post the images of your spreadsheet and StatDisk results in the argument area concurrently after a while a truth of your findings and the responses to the questions beneath.

Example of what StatDisk results should face affect steadfast beneath! 

  1. Do these costs answer to follow from a population that has a ordinary dispensation? Why or why not?
  2. Can the average of your basis exemplification be treated as a rate from a population having a ordinary dispensation? Why or why not?
  3. Did an “unusually low” or “unusually high” z-mandible rate betide?
  4. Was the associated z mandible verisimilitude rate close than 0.05 (p < 0.05); averageing a “significantly low” or “significantly high” adventure? If yes, what are the implications for the sordid and/or aircraft?
  5. What were your findings? Hint: centre on the conducive average, banner deviation and z-mandible (apprehend verisimilitude) to construe your results.