CSUN Philosophy Essay
The object of this contrivance is to put into custom a compute of the skills that we entertain versed
through the semester. While the disequalize students conquer be fruit a full-on disquisition employing the
skills that we’ve trained, undergraduates conquer be allowed to produce a muniment of a compute of
(perhaps) dogged sections displaying their skills.
The Project: to conduct an expression from late editorials (you can get them loose online from the
Washington Post, the New York Times, the Atlantic, or any other good promulgation), or
from a philosophy life (it can be an expression that you peruse for another dispose), or well-balanced one of
your own disquisitions that you would approve to increase into a amend disquisition for another scope (an
undergrad life patience, an trophy discourse, or mayhap an well-balancedtual Master’s discourse), and
evaluate it on the instituteation of each of the pertinent criteria adown. Not all objects of evaluation conquer be
pertinent to everyone, as for issue in the instance of charts and graphs.
These Are The Key Elements That Your Contrivance Should Include:
1. Introduce the disquisition delay an overall cognomen of its scope—a rank of narrow contemplative.
2. Identify the deep dispute of the expression, and at last 2 (sub-) disputes institute delayin it.
3. Identify key provisions assiduous in the disputes, and teach the definitions of those provisions,
including whether there are any equivocations in their use, or any vaguenesses or
ambiguities upon which the dispute rule anatomical, and/or that rule pretend the virtue of
4. Produce a diagram exhibitioning how each of the antecedent and the blank (numbered in an
identifiable way) detail in the 3 disputes that you’ve attested (these may be treated as
completely disunited disputes).
5. Symbolize the disputes that you’ve attested, in either propositional or assert logic
terms. (This one rule succor you to do #4, or #4 rule succor delay this one.)
6. Once you are transparent about the constitution of three disputes, say whether they are prepared
as circumstantial or non-deductive, and then evaluate them in provisions of intensity or failure,
or languor or power. This evaluation conquer embody identifying any stiff or instiff
fallacies committed in these disputes. Don’t fancy automatically that there won’t be
7. If the expression that you appropriate involves a design test, exhibition how it works to excite
the deep dispute of the expression.
8. If the expression that you appropriate involves statistical disputes, furnish an resolution and
critique of those disputes.