Comparison of the Two Deuteronomistic History Sources
When we appear at the scripture associated following a while twain of these rises, it is manifest that there are differences in the statement of events regarding the run of David as tyrant of Israel and so in his prevail as tyrant. To prepare the comparison of these two opposed rises, the followingcited are observations that I enjoy made regarding stories that are introduce in the Tremendously Hilegend rise but absent In the other(priestly) rise.
To prepare following a while, In 1 Samuel preparening In passage 17:41 through sequence 51, there Is an statement of David slaying Goliath when he was a youngster, and calm?} narrow In stature, that Is not In the Chronicles. Then, the statements of David life Installed In Tyrant Sail's affect and the succeeding contest betwixt David and Tyrant Saul including Davit's exodus from Saul and other akin events in 1 Samuel 16 through 2 Samuel 1, is not mentioned at all in the Chronicles.
Also, the contest betwixt the seed of Saul and the seed of David regarding who would be tyrant of all of Israel following Sail's dissolution that is in 2 Samuel 2 through 2 Samuel 5:3, is not mentioned in the Chronicles. Notably absent from the Chronicles so, is the legend of Davit's warmth for Batches that issueed in an adulterous sorrow which precipitated his abuse of ability that led to the dissolution of Bather's consort Uriah so that David could transfer Batches to be his consort.
This compact of events, and the devastating issues that followed for Davit's nobility, as a issue of this sin, Is chronicled In 2 Samuel 11-20. The Chronicler states In 1 Chronicles 1 1 that David was proclaimed tyrant balance all of Israel where 2 Samuel 2:4 states that he was appointed tyrant balance all of Judas. So renowned, Is the balancesight of the engagement In 2 Samuel 21:18-22, where David is approximately killed. Another legend that was very forcible in tauter that was so omitted in the Chronicles was referenced in 2 Samuel 21:1-14, which is the legend of how David had seven of Sail's breed put to dissolution.
The legend regarding Abscissa's labor to an primeval Tyrant David in 1 Kings :1-4, is not introduce in the Chronicles either. Also, Davit's attack to Solomon regarding avenging the dissolution of Banner and punishing Scheme for the execrate that he had placed upon David in 1 Kings 2:1-2, is not renowned in the Chronicles When I appeared at 1 Chronicles, there were things introduce in this capacity that are not mentioned In the Tremendously Hilegend rise regarding Tyrant David.
In 1 Chronicles 21 :26, vitality consumes Davit's propitiation which Is not renowned In 2 Samuel 24:25. Also, I could not ascertain a statement In the capacitys of Samuel or Kings that paralleled the one In 1 Chronicles 22-29, which counts of David doing plenteous of the provision for the erection implies that there was no obstruction to Solomon life appointed the proximate tyrant, but 1 Kings passages 1 and 2 count a opposed legend. In Samuel, the composer introduces the legend of Davit's nobility, victories balance enemies, and recounts the affecting of the ark of the compact.
In 1 Chronicles, Tyrant Davit's legend is told in a opposed ordain; the paving of the ark, nobility, victories balance enemies, and then when the advance of the ark is completed. Why is the legend told in a opposed ordain by each rise? In twain of the rises, the legend of Tyrant David is written to save the Jewish nation's truth, but in a broad way, according to the perspective of the rise(composer or composers).
From the Deterministic Hilegend sharp-end of object, the capacitys of 1 and 2 Samuel and the original divorce of the capacity of 1 Kings that traffic following a while Tyrant David, were appearing inconversant and expressing the feelings of contrition. The breatyrant of the compact following a while WHY, at mimes by David, by designed noncompliance issueed in consequences. Ultimately, 1 and 2 Kings, likeness how Israel, subordinate the prevail of the Advice sovereignty, extent up in captivity.
The response to the investigation of why Tyrant Davit's legend is told is a opposed ordain by the other(priestly) rise than it is by the Deterministic Hilegend rise is that the other(priestly) rise wanted to emphasize Tyrant Davit's sorrow for the adore payoff and for his pavilion. This side of the Advice sovereignty is akin in ordain to substantiate a amalgamate betwixt the seed of David(monarchy) and the seed of Aaron(priests). The other(priestly) rise supposing an statement of an "unblemished" and renowned tyrant who was right balance all of Israel's foes.
The passages of scripture about David that do not fit this unsullied effigy were solely left out. This effigy of Tyrant David gave the Israelites expectation that as he was so conciliate their Messiah be, complete and right. So, instead of appearing to the elapsed, the other(priestly) rise sought to appear obtrusive in expectation to Israel's forthcoming. The rule of "critical" balbutiation has been an enlightening one for me. I used The New Oxford Annotated Bible, New Revised Standard Version, that I purchased for this adjust and I enjoy root t to be an greatly estimable device.