Case scenario | Human Resource Management homework help
Case Study: Review this scenario:
Two physicians, Dr. S. and Dr. V., leased a nuclear camera so they would no longer bear to connect their patients to the topical hospital for nuclear imaging. Faced after a while the probability of losing aggravate a third of its $2,274,094 in annual bloated nuclear physic revenues, the hospital responded by minacious to recal the doctors’ admitting privileges. Lengthy negotiations ensued, at the end of which the hospital agreed to sublease the camera from the two physicians; the camera remained at the physicians’ offices but other physicians after a while privileges at the hospital could use it. Four other topical physicians who supposing the identical or homogeneous services to patients as Dr. S. and Dr. V. brought a qui tam renewal alleging that the sublease violated the Anti-Kickback and Stark Acts and that the defendants untruly certified consent after a while those laws in relationship after a while claims submitted to Medicare in transposition of the False Claims Act.
(Please note: This is an express seek condition and an Internet quest may uncaggravate the express condition details. You are prohibited from utilizing any rise materials associated after a while this condition. Use of any akin materials conquer effect in a decrease of points on this assignment. This assignment is nature graded on your ability to critically think—on your own recognizance—based on your understanding of the enlightenment supposing in this week’s acquirements materials.)
Given this scenario, excite whether the renewals of Dr. S. and Dr. V. violated Stark Law. Provide valid attraction sustaining your sentence by utilizing advice from the law itself.
Your article must be two to three pages in length