In this assignment, you must confutation the “Answer Implying Guilty,” and the “Answer Implying Not Guilty” topics. Both responses must set-on-foot by stating either “Yes” or “No” for each commit and a insignificant tabulation that explains why. One development of the leading topic was granted.
IMPORTANT: ALL IMPLYING GUILTY ANSWERS ARE NOT ALWAYS “NO” RESPONSES AND ALL IMPLYING NOT GUILTY ANSWERS ARE NOT ALWAYS ‘YES’ RESPONSES.
Could other DLP traders accept manipulated GEDS’s affair systems love Kerviel did?
No, the methods populated by Kerviel were so tortuous that no one else could accept replicated them.
Yes, Kerviel did not accept to customize the systems in any way in command to suppress his unacknowledged and spurious trades.
Had there been any preceding instances or notifications of deficiencies in DLP’s controls?
Was Société Générale wise in assigning only responsibility for trade occasion slip to trading skillful-treatment?
Did GEDS execute cogent use of trade occasion skillful-treatment?
Why did financial reporting seize the injury, not trading skillful-treatment, operations, or occasion skillful-treatment?
Was Société Générale so focused on achieving development on abundant fronts that it slighted to endue imperfectly muscular systems and interior controls?