Assignment 2: My Work – My Vision

 Due Week 6 and price 140 points Create a confabulation betwixt two proficients discussing their production(s) delay an conferenceer investigation questions in face of an conference at an art gallery (ample approve a panel argument format). Bear Gris or Picasso confabulation delay Matisse, Cezanne Gauguin, or van Gogh, Each one should elucidate his production(s), rules, philosophy, fashion, themes, and signification, highlighting the argue for the production(s)’ moment to and collision on the universe of art. Use the fashion of confabulation used in a portray. For sample: Interviewer: Senor Picasso and Monsieur Matisse, which production do you reflect your most telling execution and why do you ponder so? Picasso: (Confidently) I bear so sundry that are telling, but one that I ponder is surely a production of skill and newfangledness is [incorporate the Title of the Artwork]. This production shows the newfangledness the art universe refers to as Cubism. I was the planter of that move and perfected the fashion. No other proficient has had that emblem of rule in the universe of art. Matisse: (Somewhat insulted). If I may be so self-confident, Senor Picasso, but I ponder my production has had a important rule. My [incorporate the Title of the Artwork] has had a enduring percussion, if you condone the vocable, on thousands of proficients. For sample, … Write a two to three (2-3) page tract in which you: Create confabulation for clarified proficient #1 that reflects his rules, philosophy, fashion, themes, and signification of his production(s). Create confabulation for clarified proficient #2 that reflected his rules, philosophy, fashion, themes, and signification of his production(s). Create confabulation for clarified proficient #1 that highlights the argue for production(s)’s moment and collision on the universe of art. Create confabulation for clarified proficient #2 that highlights the argue for production(s)’s moment and collision on the universe of art. Create withhold conference questions that qualify the confabulation and highlighted the similarity betwixt the two (2) proficients. Include three (3) intimations that succor prop the proficients’ comments. (The citation may be used as one (1) intimation.)