Annotated Bibliography: Doctoral Identity


 

Annotations are pictorial and ticklish assessments of attainment  that succor investigationers to evaluate texts and indicate regard in  relation to a detail investigation plan. Ultimately, they are a  note-taking instrument that fosters ticklish thinking, demonstrates  understanding, and evaluates the rise symbolical for feasible posterior  use.  In this assignment, you allure unravel and annotate three declaration.

General Requirements:

  • Locate  the declaration by Baker and Pifer (2011), Gardner (2009), and Smith and  Hatmaker (2014) in the Course Materials for this question.
  • This  assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric antecedent to opening the  assignment to grace everyday delay the expectations for lucky  completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA mode for  their letter assignments. Review the GCU APA Mode Guide for Letter  located in the Student Success Center. Note: A name page is  required for this assignment, but a regard page is not required past  the regards are interjacent delay the annotations.
  • Refer  to the wealth, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies” located in the  Student Success Center, for added direction on completing this  assignment in the misapply mode. Use “Sample APA Annotated  Bibliography” stance in this wealth.
  • You are required to comply this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Read  the declaration by Baker & Pifer (2011), Gardner (2009), and Smith  & Hatmaker (2014). These declaration and the perennial links to them  are located in the Course Materials for Question 2.

Provide an  annotated bibliography (750-900 accounts completion, still the regard  notes) of the declaration. Including the forthcoming for each expression:

  1. A regard silence formatted according to APA mode guidelines. The regard silence is not interjacent in the completion acnumber number.
  2. An  annotation (250-300 accounts) of the expression. Annotations are pictorial  and ticklish assessments of co-ordinate reviewed declaration. Annotations  summarize the key concepts and evaluate the expression for its strengths  and weaknesses. Why was the consider conducted? What was the population  studied? What did the investigationer(s) finish? What other knowledge  about this consider do you like is rare or expressive to foreclosure? Are  there inequitable statements made by the inventor you craving to restrain?