| Course Code |
Class Code |
Assignment Title |
Total Points |
| ELM-580 |
ELM-580-O501 |
Literary Genres |
50.0 |
| Criteria |
Percentage |
No Submission (0.00%) |
Insufficient (69.00%) |
Approaching (74.00%) |
Acceptable (87.00%) |
Target (100.00%) |
Comments |
Points Earned |
| Content |
100.0% |
| Fiction and Nonfiction Genres |
| 25.0% |
|
|
|
| Not addressed. |
Matrix includes insufficient and incomplete examples and definitions of fiction and nonfiction genre along with poorly researched and weak examples of grade cluster appropriate texts for grades 1-3, 4-5, and 6-8. |
Examples and definitions of fiction and nonfiction genre in the matrix are marginal and inconsistent along with irrelevant examples of grade cluster appropriate texts for grades 1-3, 4-5, and 6-8. |
Matrix includes detailed and clear examples and definitions of fiction and nonfiction genre along with coherent examples of grade cluster appropriate texts for grades 1-3, 4-5, and 6-8. |
Matrix includes well-researched and thoughtful examples and definitions of fiction and nonfiction genre along with proficient examples of grade cluster appropriate texts for grades 1-3, 4-5, and 6-8. |
| Literary Genre Integration |
25.0% Not addressed.
Examples included in matrix are missing components of strategies of how to integrate each selected text into reading, writing, and listening instruction along with a poor and undeveloped description of how to integrate each text with a technology application. |
Matrix includes inconsistent and inadequate examples of strategies of how to integrate each selected text into reading, writing, and listening instruction along with beginning-level description of how to integrate each text with a technology application. |
Matrix includes credible and direct examples of strategies of how to integrate each selected text into reading, writing, and listening instruction along with an adequate and detailed description of how to integrate each text with a technology application. |
Matrix includes meaningful and insightful examples of strategies of how to integrate each selected text into reading, writing, and listening instruction along with a skillful and well-researched description of how to integrate each text with a technology application. |
| Reflection |
20.0% |
Not addressed.
Reflection poorly addresses how multiple forms of literary genre can be implemented in your future classroom and is missing components of an explanation of the strategies for student comprehension in reading and how selecting the appropriate text supports a positive attitude toward reading and comprehension skills. |
Reflection includes a partially proficient summary on how multiple forms of literary genre can be implemented in your future classroom, a vague explanation of the strategies for student comprehension in reading, and a marginal description on how selecting the appropriate text supports a positive attitude toward reading and comprehension skills. |
Reflection includes a logical and relevant summary on how multiple forms of literary genre can be implemented in your future classroom, a solid explanation of the strategies for student comprehension in reading, and a successful description on how selecting the appropriate text supports a positive attitude toward reading and comprehension skills. |
Reflection includes an exceptional and thoughtful summary on how multiple forms of literary genre can be implemented in your future classroom, an insightful explanation of the strategies for student comprehension in reading, and a meaningful description on how selecting the appropriate text supports a positive attitude toward reading and comprehension skills. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
| 15.0% |
Not addressed.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. |
Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. |
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
15.0% Not addressed.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several minor formatting errors are present. |
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage |
100% |
