• Identify, summarize, and understand the concepts and arguments presented in the Steinem reading, If Men Could Menstruate that is attached.
• Identify a different situation, concept, or identity that is associated with socially constructed ideas of power and privilege
• Develop your own “political fantasy” to share with classmates.

For this assignment, you will do the following:

• At the heart of the Steinem piece is the following quote, “In short, the characteristics of the powerful, whatever they may be, are thought to be better than the characteristics of the powerless—and logic has nothing to do with it.” Use this quote as the guide for how to write your own political fantasy.
• Write a brief (500 – 750 words) discussion post that is inspired by the reading If Men Could Menstruate. For this discussion you will identify a concept, practice, or policy this is built around the social construction of one group’s identity.  Similar to the Steinem piece, you will have to identify what the assumptions are of the group who holds less power and imagine what would happen if that characteristic was a part of the group who holds more power. An example could be to imagine if men could give birth, or if heterosexual people were asked how they knew they were heterosexual.  You will then describe how that concept would become appropriated or understood as source of pride, strength, or justification of their social position. 

If Men Could Menstruate

By Gloria Steinem, Ms. Magazine, October 1978

A white minority of the world has spent centuries conning us into thinking that a white skin makes
people superior—even though the only thing it really does is make them more subject to ultraviolet rays
and to wrinkles. Male human beings have built whole cultures around the idea that penis-envy is
“natural” to women—though having such an unprotected organ might be said to make men vulnerable,
and the power to give birth makes womb-envy at least as logical.

In short, the characteristics of the powerful, whatever they may be, are thought to be better than the
characteristics of the powerless—and logic has nothing to do with it.

What would happen, for instance, if suddenly, magically, men could menstruate and women could not?

The answer is clear—menstruation would become an enviable, boast-worthy, masculine event:

Men would brag about how long and how much.

Boys would mark the onset of menses, that longed-for proof of manhood, with religious ritual and stag
parties.

Congress would fund a National Institute of Dysmenorrhea to help stamp out monthly discomforts.

Sanitary supplies would be federally funded and free. (Of course, some men would still pay for the
prestige of commercial brands such as John Wayne Tampons, Muhammad Ali’s Rope-a-dope Pads,
Joe Namath Jock Shields—“For Those Light Bachelor Days,” and Robert “Baretta” Blake Maxi-Pads.)

Military men, right-wing politicians, and religious fundamentalists would cite menstruation (“men-
struation”) as proof that only men could serve in the Army (“you have to give blood to take blood”),
occupy political office (“can women be aggressive without that steadfast cycle governed by the planet
Mars?”), be priest and ministers (“how could a woman give her blood for our sins?”) or rabbis (“without
the monthly loss of impurities, women remain unclean”).

Male radicals, left-wing politicians, mystics, however, would insist that women are equal, just different,
and that any woman could enter their ranks if she were willing to self-inflict a major wound every month
(“you MUST give blood for the revolution”), recognize the preeminence of menstrual issues, or
subordinate her selfness to all men in their Cycle of Enlightenment. Street guys would brag (“I’m a three
pad man”) or answer praise from a buddy (“Man, you lookin‘ good!”) by giving fives and saying, “Yeah,
man, I’m on the rag!” TV shows would treat the subject at length. (“Happy Days”: Richie and Potsie try
to convince Fonzie that he is still “The Fonz,” though he has missed two periods in a row.) So would
newspapers. (SHARK SCARE THREATENS MENSTRUATING MEN. JUDGE CITES MONTHLY
STRESS IN PARDONING RAPIST.) And movies. (Newman and Redford in “Blood Brothers”!)

Men would convince women that intercourse was more pleasurable at “that time of the month.”
Lesbians would be said to fear blood and therefore life itself—though probably only because they
needed a good menstruating man.

Of course, male intellectuals would offer the most moral and logical arguments. How could a woman
master any discipline that demanded a sense of time, space, mathematics, or measurement, for
instance, without that in-built gift for measuring the cycles of the moon and planets—and thus for
measuring anything at all? In the rarefied fields of philosophy and religion, could women compensate
for missing the rhythm of the universe? Or for their lack of symbolic death-and-resurrection every
month?

Liberal males in every field would try to be kind: the fact that “these people” have no gift for measuring
life or connecting to the universe, the liberals would explain, should be punishment enough.

And how would women be trained to react? One can imagine traditional women agreeing to all
arguments with a staunch and smiling masochism. (“The ERA would force housewives to wound
themselves every month”: Phyllis Schlafly. “Your husband’s blood is as sacred as that of Jesus – and so
sexy, too!” Marabel Morgan.) Reformers and Queen Bees would try to imitate men, and pretend to have
a monthly cycle. All feminists would explain endlessly that men, too, needed to be liberated from the
false idea of Martian aggressiveness, just as women needed to escape the bonds of menses envy.
Radical feminists would add that the oppression of the nonmenstrual was the pattern for all other
oppressions (“Vampires were our first freedom fighters!”) Cultural feminists would develop a bloodless
imagery in art and literature. Socialist feminists would insist that only under capitalism would men be
able to monopolize menstrual blood . . . .

In fact, if men could menstruate, the power justifications could probably go on forever.

If we let them.