1 page poetry analysis – I need this in 2 hours


Exercise I: "From Teaching delay the Norton Anthology: "As a technical studious expression, "style" describes the compositional conduct that mould texts and grant them a oneness of move or subject. Diction can be domesticated down into sundry components: diction, flatten, syntax, diction, embellishment, and aggravate. Rhetorical doctrine advises that the diction subserve the subject. The aftercited employment approaches Beowulf through a convergence on verbal diction. In bardry, the efficacy of import can be select unequally aggravate the elements of diction. Does the bard strain things and qualities, or actions? Nouns and adjectives, or verbs and adverbs? Use a diction handbook to criticism the compressiveness of harangue.

Rewrite lines 1557-68 of Heaney's translation of Beowulf, conveying the identical instruction but permutation the instruction about so it weighs differently on the diction. Do this unintermittently for nouns and adjectives, and a promote period for verbs and adverbs.

Example, lines 12-14, rewritten delay efficacy on verbs and adverbs: God easeed them and afterward Shield fathered one who boyishly played and prowled nearby.

Rewritten delay the efficacy of import settled in-great-measure on nouns and adjectives: The slow rise of a boy-child for Shield--a cub in the yard, a ease from a merciful God for that commonwealth.

Which are the essential, subjectd, eye-catching say? Move them about. Now, which of your "shiftings" sounds most relish the lay? On what compressiveness of harangue does the Beowulf bard settle most of the lay's efficacy of import? Write a petty article [shaft to the discourse forum your thoughts] on the relative among the lay's "content" and its verbal diction: would you say there's a good-natured-natured fit among the diction and the resigned?"